Role of Nano-Size SiO2 Additive on the Thermal
Behavior of Cyanoacrylate Nanocomposite
Amir Yaghmaei, Mehrdad Kashefi Torbati, Seyyed Mojtaba Zebarjad
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Nowadays, solvent-free, one-part cyanoacrylate adhesive is widely used in medicine and dentistry. According to a literature survey done by the authors, there are
few papers concentrated on the role of nano-sized particles on the thermal behavior of cyanoacrylate glue.
Thus the main goal of the current research focused on
clarifying the role of nano-sized SiO2 on the thermal
behavior of cyanoacrylate. Thermal behavior of all
materials including cyanoacrylate and its nanocomposites was studied by using Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
methods. The results of DSC analysis showed that an
increase in the amount of nano-sized SiO2 results in
decreases in the duration of cyanoacrylate curing,
energy release during polymerization, and incubation
time of polymerization. Furthermore, the results of TGA
tests illustrated that the weight loss of cyanoacrylate
strongly depends on the contents of both caffeine
and SiO2. In fact, an increase in nano-sized SiO2
content increases the degradation temperature of
cyanoacrylate. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 16:204–208, 2010.
ª 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers
INTRODUCTION
Cyanoacrylate is a solvent-free, one-part adhesive that
was first introduced to the industrial market in the 1950s
[1]. Its ease of application, versatility, and solvent resistance make cyanoacrylate popular in industries. A wide
variety of applications can be mentioned for cyanoacrylate including automotive [2], electrical and electronics
[3], fingerprinting [4, 5], medicine, and daily uses.
The cyanoacrylate monomers can be polymerized by
both free-radical and anionic mechanisms, but the latter
hold much greater interest. This is mainly because for this
mode of polymerization, they are among the most reactive
monomers known and, as a consequence of this extreme
reactivity, they are capable of initiation by relatively weak
covalent bases [6]. This anionic reaction is inhibited at
pH \ 5.5 [6]; hence monomers are kept in their liquid
Correspondence to: S. M. Zebarjad; zebarjad@um.ac.ir
DOI 10.1002/vnl.20236
View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com.
Ó 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers
JOURNAL OF VINYL & ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGY—
—2010
form by the addition of a weak acid during storage and
prior to use. Prior to polymerization, neutralization of the
acids takes place. Any practical, weak-electron-donor
base, such as moisture on the surface of a substrate, can
trigger the polymerization reaction [7, 8]. Basic chemicals
such as sodium carbonate, phosphates, amines, caffeine,
or pyridine can be used to neutralize the stabilizer and so
accelerate polymerization [2, 9, 10].
The lower members of the series are used for applications such as the assembly of delicate electronic components and household items. The higher homologues, i.e.,
butyl-, hexyl-, and heptyl-being wetted well by blood, are
used in medicine, e.g., as tissue binders [11–16] and in drug
delivery [17–21]. One of the most important applications of
cyanoacrylate is in dentistry. This is because cyanoacrylates
are bacteriostatic [22] and can adhere to a wide range of
materials with rapid development of strength. Cyanoacrylate can be used in dentistry for tooth cavity treatment [23],
tooth pit and fissure sealants [24], and tooth desensitizers
[25]. As cyanoacrylates covalently bond to dentin [26] and
make strong bonds, they are suitable in dental applications.
As was mentioned, any practical, weak-electron-donor base,
such as moisture on the surface of a substrate, can trigger
the polymerization reaction. Thus, hydroxyl ions from the
moisture of the dentin can cause rapid polymerization [26,
27] without losing a significant amount of water [27, 28].
Modifiers such as alumina, calcium carbonate, hydroxyapatite, and silicon dioxide are added to cyanoacrylate to improve its properties. Ridgway et al. [29] utilized
cyanoacrylate and alumina powders to produce heart
valves by a powder injection molding method. Leonard
and Brandes [30] and Cijvan et al. [31] used cyanoacrylate/(calcium carbonate) composite as dental cement. Hydroxyapatite micro powders have been utilized by Bennetts et al. [32] and Tomlinson et al. [7] in cyanoacrylate
in order to produce novel dental cements. Takeuchi [33,
34] and Chang and Joos [35] have also taken advantage
of silicon dioxide micro powders in cyanoacrylate
cements to use them in tooth cavity treatment and as sealants in dentistry. Silicon dioxide nano powders have been
used as aerogels [36, 37] to improve cyanoacrylate coating
properties by the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method.
FIG. 1. TEM micrograph of nano-size silicon dioxide.
Also, some studies have concentrated on degradation behavior and glass transition temperature (Tg) of cyanoacrylate
[38–43]. According to the literature survey done by the
authors, there are no papers concentrated on the curing of
cyanoacrylate under isothermal conditions. Besides, the role
of nano-size silicon dioxide on the curing and thermal
behavior of cyanoacrylate is still a subject of controversy
among investigators. Thus the authors decided to fill the literature gap on this issue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Alkoxyethyl cyanoacrylate (Loctite 460, Henkel) with
a molecular weight of 141 and a viscosity of 40 mPa.s
and silicon dioxide nano powder (Nanolin, China) were
used as matrix and reinforcement, respectively. Figure 1
shows a transmission electron microscope micrograph from
nano-size silicon dioxide. These nano powders are polygonal in shape and 10–20 nm in size. The purity of the silicon dioxide nano powder used in this research is 99%.
As was mentioned before, in order to prevent polymerization, acids are added to cyanoacrylate. In this research
para-toluenesulfonic acid (catalogue No. 814725, Merck),
as suggested by other investigators [2, 11], was utilized.
Neutralization should take place before polymerization,
and caffeine (catalogue No. 119164, Merck) was used in
the current research because of its biocompatibility.
Sample Preparation
To view nano-size silicon dioxide powders, transmission electron microscopy was utilized. For sample prepa-
DOI 10.1002/vnl
ration, powders were first mixer-milled (Retsich MM400,
Germany) for 10 min and then dispersed in ethanol and
sonicated for 1 h. After that, the dispersed powders were
placed on a grid and a transmission electron microscope
(LEO 919 AB) micrograph was taken (see Fig. 1).
To prepare nanocomposite samples, first, 1 wt% of
acid was dissolved in the cyanoacrylate. Without this
amount of acid, polymerization occurs immediately upon
addition of nano-sized silicon dioxide powders because of
the moisture on their surface. In the next step, 1.5 wt% of
caffeine was added to the mixture for acid neutralization
and as a polymerization initiator. Without caffeine, polymerization will be retarded for several days. Minimum
amounts of acid and caffeine were chosen after several
experiments in order to investigate the role of silicon
dioxide nano powders in the composite. The final step
was addition of different amounts of silicon dioxide. To
prevent agglomeration of the nano-sized powders, they
were milled by a mixer-mill device (Retsich MM400,
Germany) for 10 min prior to their addition to cyanoacrylate. During the addition of the SiO2 powders, the mixture
was under ultrasonic processing (Sonicator 3000, Misonix) in order to prevent agglomeration. All fabricated
samples are listed in Table 1.
Chemical Structure Evaluation
In order to examine the chemical structure of the nanocomposite, FTIR spectra were recorded. They were
obtained with a Shimadzu 4300 FTIR spectrometer by
using KBr pellets.
Thermal Evaluation
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; DSC-60, Shimadzu, Japan) was utilized to calculate the energy
released during polymerization and the setting time of the
nanocomposite glue. For this purpose the test was done
under isothermal conditions following the ASTM D3418
standard. Samples were kept in the device at room temperature until polymerization occurred.
In order to obtain the degradation temperature, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA; TGA-50, Shimadzu, Japan)
was utilized according to the ASTM E2402 standard.
Cured specimens were placed in the device and heated at
the rate of 108C/min up to 5008C.
TABLE 1. Nanocomposites produced.
Sample
name
Cy/0% SiO2
Cy/8% SiO2
Cy/10% SiO2
Cy/12% SiO2
Polymer
content
(wt%)
Acid
content
(wt%)
Caffeine
content
(wt%)
SiO2
content
(wt%)
97.5
89.5
87.5
85.5
1
1
1
1
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0
8
10
12
JOURNAL OF VINYL & ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGY—
—2010 205
FIG. 2. FTIR spectrum (in KBr) for cyanoacrylate/SiO2 nanocomposite.
FIG. 4. Dependence of incubation time of cyanoacrylate polymerization
on SiO2 content.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The infrared spectrum of a cyanoacrylate/SiO2 sample
is displayed in Fig. 2. Absorption bands for the solid-state
vibrations in SiO2 are at 440, 800, and 1064 cm21. Further bands can be seen at 1410 cm21 for das SiÀ
ÀCH3 and
880 cm21 for drocking SiÀ in À
ÀC
ÀSi(CH3)2 [44]. Furthermore, vibrations for carbonyl groups and triply bonded
carbon (À
ÀCBCÀ appear at 1720 and 2250 cm21,
À)
respectively, as well as a corresponding covalent vibration
(BCÀ
ÀH) at 3300 cm21. Other bands such as d(NÀ 2),
ÀH
d(CÀ
ÀH), and d(CÀ
ÀH) can be found at 664, 1250, and
3000 cm21, respectively [45].
The results of DSC analysis can be seen in Fig. 3. It is
worth noting that because of the long periods of polymerization for 4 and 6% of SiO2, results for these formulations do not appear in the figure. As indicated, incubation
time and duration of polymerization depend strongly on
nano-size SiO2 content. When silicon dioxide is added to
the mixture, both the energy released during polymerization and the maximum temperature decrease.
It was indicated by the DSC curves that the incubation
time of polymerization and its duration decreased upon
increasing the silicon dioxide content. These trends can
be seen in Figs. 4 and 5. They occur because of the moisture on the surface of the nano powders. This moisture
can also reduce the propagation time of polymerization.
Therefore, duration of setting is reduced by increasing the
amount of nano powder. As mentioned before, moisture
can trigger the polymerization of cyanoacrylate [7, 8]. It
is worth noting that the reduction of setting time is important in many cases such as tooth cavity treatments.
The area beneath the DSC curves gives the energy
released during polymerization. As shown in Fig. 6, the
energy decreases as the SiO2 amount increases. In fact,
with a higher powder content in the glue, the amount of
cured polymer will be decreased. Besides, other bonds (as
mentioned before) are produced between silicon and polymer [36]. This is why the released energy decreases as
nano-silica is added to the glue. The interesting result
FIG. 3. DSC curves of cyanoacrylate and its nanocomposites.
FIG. 5. Variation of duration of cyanoacrylate polymerization with
SiO2 content.
206 JOURNAL OF VINYL & ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGY—
—2010
DOI 10.1002/vnl
FIG. 6. Dependence of released energy on nano-size silicon dioxide
content.
achieved in the current research is that the released
energy increases the temperature during polymerization.
This result is similar to what was proposed by Eriksson
and Alberktsson [46]. They mentioned that releasing significant heat during polymerization that can increase temperature more than 108C can damage surrounding tissues, so
that the temperature should also be monitored. As can be
concluded from DSC curves, the temperature rise from
room temperature is decreased by increasing the SiO2
powder content (see Fig. 7) because of the reduction in
released energy. Therefore, changes in silicon dioxide content can reduce the rise in temperature below safety limits.
Thermogravimetric analysis results are shown in Fig. 8
and Table 2. The increase in SiO2 amount leads to a
slight increase in T210% (8C; the temperature of 10%
FIG. 8. TGA curves for cyanoacrylate and its nanocomposites.
weight loss) and a significant increase in T250% (8C; the
temperature of 50% weight loss).
The TGA results demonstrate that the temperatures of
10% weight loss for four compositions are not significantly different but that an increase in the temperature of
50% weight loss can be observed. For comparison, the
amounts of mass loss at 210–2508C are shown in Fig. 9. It
can be observed that upon increasing the SiO2 content, the
amount of mass loss decreases. This effect occurs because
the new bonds formed between silicon and polymer need a
higher amount of heat to degrade. Thus, it can be concluded that silicon dioxide can increase the degradation
temperature of nanocomposites-based cyanoacrylate.
CONCLUSIONS
Thermal behavior of cyanoacrylate in the presence of
nano-sized SiO2 was investigated. Differential scanning
calorimetry was utilized to measure setting time and
released energy of the cyanoacrylate. Thermogravimetric
analysis was also utilized to determine the degradation
temperature of the cyanoacrylate. It was found that the
addition of silicon dioxide nano powder reduced the setting time, the energy released during polymerization, and
the temperature rise resulting from this energy release. The
degradation temperature of cyanoacrylate was increased by
the addition of nano-sized SiO2.
TABLE 2. Data extracted from DSC curves.
Sample name
FIG. 7. Temperature difference (from room temperature) changes with
increases in SiO2 content.
DOI 10.1002/vnl
T210% (8C)
T250% (8C)
Mass loss
(210–2508C) (%)
Cy/0% SiO2
Cy/8% SiO2
Cy/10% SiO2
Cy/12% SiO2
219.3
220.1
220.6
221.2
237.1
240.2
242.3
245.1
84.1
73.8
67.8
67.5
JOURNAL OF VINYL & ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGY—
—2010 207
FIG. 9. Mass loss changes between 210 and 2508C.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC) for their financial support
and Central Laboratory of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
for their technical support of this research.
REFERENCES
1. ASM, Engineering Materials Handbook, Vol. 3, Adhesives and
Sealants, ASM, Ohio, USA (1990).
2. J.S. Ridgway, J.B. Hull, and C.R. Gentle, J. Mater. Process
Tech., 133(1–2), 181 (2003).
3. O.N. Klenovich, and A.M. Vetrova, Polymer Sci. C., 49(1),
50 (2007).
4. I.I. Negulescu, E. Calugaru, and C. Vasile, J. Macromol.
Sci. Chem., 124, 75 (1987).
5. A. Gupta, K. Buckley, and R. Sutton, Forensic Sci. Int.,
179, 172 (2008).
6. B. Cook and A. Allen, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 13,
73 (1993).
7. S.K. Tomlinson, O.R. Ghita, R.M. Hooper, and K.E. Evans,
Dent. Mater., 23, 799 (2007).
8. H.G.M. Edwards and J.S. Day, J. Raman Spectros., 35, 555
(2004).
9. H. Lee, Cyanoacrylate Resins—The Instant Adhesives, Pasadena Technology Press, USA (1981).
10. C. Birkinshaw, M. Buggy, and A. O’Neill, J. Chem. Tech.
Biotech., 66, 19 (1996).
11. G.A. Greenhill, and B. O’Regan, Br. J. O. Maxill. Surg.,
47(4), 290 (2009).
12. N. Adler, S. Nachumovsky, S. Meshulam-Derazon, and D.
Ad-El, Burns, 33(6), 803 (2007).
13. D. Wiand, D. DiNapoli, A. Burkhartsmeyer, D. Meade, M.
Heller and R. Hill, Ann. Emerg. Med., 50(3), 36 (2007).
14. D.E. Setlik, D.L. Seldomridge, R.A. Adelman, T.M. Semchyshyn, and N.A. Afshari, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 140(5), 920
(2005).
208 JOURNAL OF VINYL & ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGY—
—2010
15. D.C. Ritterband, S.W. Meskin, D.E. Shapiro, J. Kusmierczyk, J.A. Seedor, and R.S. Koplin, Am. J. Ophthalmol.,
140(6), 1039 (2005).
16. M.J. Taravella and C.D. Chang, Cornea, 20, 220 (2001).
17. C. Vauthier, C. Dubernet, C. Chauvierre, I. Brigger, and P.
Couvreur, J. Contr. Release, 93, 151 (2003).
18. L. Treupel, M.F. Poupon, P. Couvreur, and F. Puisieux, C.
R. Acad. Sci., 313(17), 1 (1991).
19. C. Cuvier, L. Roblot-Treupel, J.M. Millot, G. Lizard, S.
Chevillard, M. Manfait, P. Couvreur, and M.F. Poupon,
Biochem. Pharmacol., 44, 509 (1992).
`
20. F. Nemati, C. Dubernet, H. Fessi, A. C. de Verdiere, M.F.
Poupon, F. Puisieux, and P. Couvreur, Int. J. Pharm., 138,
237 (1996).
`
´
21. A. Colin de Verdiere, C. Dubernet, F. Nemati, E. Soma, M.
´
Appel, J. Ferte, S. Bernard, F. Puisieux, and P. Couvreur,
Br. J. Cancer, 76, 198 (1997).
22. J. Grisdale, J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 64(9), 632 (1998).
23. Y. Fukushi, T. Fusayama, J. Dent. Res., 59(4), 662 (1980).
24. L.W. Ripa, Caries Res., 27(1), 77 (1993).
25. E.L. Herod, J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 56, 331 (1990).
26. D.R. Beech, J. Dent. Res., 51, 1438 (1972).
27. E.L. Jacobsen, and K.A. Shugars, J. Endod., 16(11), 516 (1990).
´
28. S. Guzman-Armstrong, R.J. Mitchell, J. Dent., 30(2–3), 113
(2002).
29. J.S. Ridgway, J.B. Hull, and C.R. Gentle, J. Mater. Process
Tech., 109(1–2), 181 (2001).
30. F. Leonard, and G. Brandes, U. S. Patent 3,607,542 (1971).
31. S. Cijvan, P.M. Margetis, and R.L. Reddick, J. Dent. Res.,
48(4), 536 (1969).
32. A.J. Bennetts, C.G. Wilde, and A.D. Wilson, U. K. Patent
2,386,121 (2003).
33. M. Takeuchi and A. Otsuki, U. S. Patent 4,012,840 (1977).
34. M. Takeuchi, U. S. Patent 3,518,762 (1970).
35. R.W.H. Chang and R.W. Joos, U. S. Patent 3,540, 126 (1968).
36. J. Suffner, G. Schechner, H. Sieger, and H. Hahn, Chem.
Vap. Deposition, 13, 459 (2007).
37. D.J. Boday, K.A. DeFriend, K.V. Wilson Jr., D. Coder, and
D.A. Loy, Chem. Mater., 20(9), 2845 (2008).
38. M.G. Han and S. Kim, Polymer, 50, 1270 (2009).
39. C.Y. Huang and Y.D. Lee, Int. J. Pharm., 325, 132 (2006).
40. C. O’Sullivan and C. Birkinshaw, Polymer Degrad. Stab.,
78, 7 (2002).
41. S. Swier and B.V. Mele, Polymer, 44, 2689 (2003).
42. R. Mulik, K. Mahadik, and A. Paradkar, Euro. J. Pharmaceut. Sci., 37(3–4), 395 (2009).
43. Y. Zhang, S. Zhu, L. Yin, F. Qian, C. Tang and C. Yin,
Eur. Polymer J., 44(6), 1654 (2008).
44. G. Socrates, Infrared Characteristic Group Frequencies,
J. Wiley & sons, Chichester, UK, (1994).
45. H. Gunzler, H.M. Heise, IR-Spektroskopie, VCH, Weinheim,
Gemany (1996).
46. A.R. Eriksson and T. Alberktsson, J. Prosthet. Dent., 50,
101 (1983).
DOI 10.1002/vnl