Reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent
Reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent
Folder:
Journal:
Year:
Abstract:
Imagine a smart solvent that can be switched reversibly from a liquid with one set of properties to another that has very different properties, upon command. Here we create such a system, in which a non-ionic liquid (an alcohol and an amine base) converts to an ionic liquid (a salt in liquid form) upon exposure to an atmosphere of carbon dioxide, and then reverts back to its non-ionic form when exposed to nitrogen or argon gas. Such switchable solvents should facilitate organic syntheses and separations by eliminating the need to remove and replace solvents after each reaction step.
DOI:
10.1038/4361102a
Type of document:
Language:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France
e-mail: prangish@pasteur.fr
† University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg,
Germany
‡ Danish Archaea Centre, Institute of Molecular
Biology and Physiology, Copenhagen University,
1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark
1. van Regenmortel, M. H. V. in Seventh Report of the
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (eds
Fauquet, C. M. et al.) 3–16 (Academic, San Diego, 2000).
2. Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M. & Stock, J. Science 252, 1162–1164
(1991).
3. Strelkov, S. V., Herrmann, H. & Aebi, U. BioEssays 25,
243–251 (2003).
4. Ausmess, N., Kuhn, J. R. & Jacobs-Wagner, C.
NATURE|Vol 436|25 August 2005
Cell 115, 705–713 (2003).
5. Hermann, H. & Aebi, U. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 79–90
(2000).
6. Pettit, S. C., Everitt, L. E., Choudhury, S., Dunn, B. M. &
Kaplan, A. H. J. Virol. 78, 8477–8485 (2004).
7. Swanstrom, R. & Willis, J. W. in Retroviruses (eds
Coffin, J. M., Hughes, S. H. & Varmus, H. E.) 263–334 (Cold
Spring Harbor Lab. Press, New York, 1997).
8. Ackermann, H. W. & Bamford, D. in Seventh Report of the
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (eds
Fauquet, C. M. et al.) 111–116 (Academic, San Diego, 2000).
9. Prangishvili, D., Stedman, K. & Zillig, W. Trends Microbiol. 9,
39–43 (2001).
Supplementary information accompanies this
communication on Nature’s website.
Competing financial interests: declared none.
doi:10.1038/nature4361101a
GREEN CHEMISTRY
Reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent
Imagine a smart solvent that can be switched
reversibly from a liquid with one set of properties to another that has very different properties, upon command. Here we create such
a system, in which a non-ionic liquid (an
alcohol and an amine base) converts to an
ionic liquid (a salt in liquid form) upon exposure to an atmosphere of carbon dioxide,
and then reverts back to its non-ionic form
when exposed to nitrogen or argon gas. Such
switchable solvents should facilitate organic
syntheses and separations by eliminating the
need to remove and replace solvents after each
reaction step.
Chemical production processes often
involve multiple reaction and separation steps,
and the type of solvent that is optimum for a
particular step may be different from the one
needed in the next step. The solvent is therefore usually removed after each step and a new
solvent added in preparation for the next, significantly adding to the economic cost and
environmental impact of the process. This
cumbersome procedure would be unnecessary if a solvent’s properties could be adjusted
for the following step while still in the reaction
vessel, enabling the same solvent to be used for
several consecutive reaction or separation
steps. Moderate changes in temperature and
pressure are incapable of triggering significant
changes in the properties of conventional solvents. In contrast, supercritical fluids1 and
CO2/organic solvent mixtures2 can be modified by pressure changes, but unfortunately
only above 40 bar.
The reaction we describe reversibly changes
the nature and properties of a solvent but
occurs under very mild conditions. We reasoned that switching a normal non-ionic
liquid to an ionic liquid should induce a
change in its properties: ionic liquids are often
viscous and always polar, whereas non-ionic
solvents are typically non-viscous and vary
widely in polarity. We chose CO2 as the ‘switch’
to elicit this change because it is a benign agent
1102
and easily removed. (For methods, see supplementary information.)
We found that exposure of a 1:1 mixture
of the two non-ionic liquids, namely DBU
(1,8-diazabicyclo-[5.4.0]-undec-7-ene) and 1hexanol, to gaseous CO2 at one atmosphere
and at room temperature causes conversion of
the liquid mixture to an ionic liquid (Fig. 1a,
b). This is readily converted back into a nonionic liquid by bubbling N2 or argon through
the liquid at room temperature or, for a more
rapid reaction, at 50 ᑻC. These changes are
demonstrated by chemical shifts in key protons, as revealed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy,
and by solvatochromic measurement of the
polarity of the solvent before and after exposure to CO2 (see supplementary information).
The reaction is exothermic and causes a
marked increase in the viscosity of the liquid.
The choice of alcohol is critical because the
1-hexylcarbonate salt (Fig. 1, right) is a viscous
liquid at room temperature, whereas the bicarbonate3,4 and methylcarbonate (ref. 5, and A. D.
Main, G. E. Fryxell and J. Linehan, unpublished
results) salts are solids and so are not candidates for smart solvents.
Our non-ionic liquid is as nonpolar as
chloroform, according to measurements using
Nile Red as solvatochromic dye (see supplementary information), whereas the liquid
under CO2 is as polar as dimethylformamide
or propanoic acid. The polarity changes in this
switchable solvent system are demonstrated by
testing the solubility of decane, a nonpolar
compound, in each liquid: it is miscible with
the liquid under N2 but not with that under
CO2 (Fig. 1c). We conclude that N2 and CO2 at
1 bar can be used as triggers of miscibility and
immiscibility, respectively.
We have built solvent switchability into molecules that are small enough to be liquid at
room temperature. Further examples of
switchable solvents, preferably ones less Lewisbasic than DBU, should eventually enable their
application in the ‘green’ production of highvalue chemicals such as pharmaceuticals.
Philip G. Jessop*, David J. Heldebrant*,
Xiaowang Li*, Charles A. Eckert†, Charles L. Liotta†
*Department of Chemistry, Queen’s University,
Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
e-mail: jessop@chem.queensu.ca
†Schools of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
30332-0100, USA
1. Jessop, P. G. & Leitner, W. (eds) Chemical Synthesis using
Supercritical Fluids (VCH/Wiley, Weinheim, 1999).
2. Subramaniam, B. & Busch, D. H. in Carbon Dioxide
Conversion and Utilization (eds Song, C., Gaffney, A. F. &
Fujimoto, K.) 364–386 (ACS, Washington, 2002).
3. Perez, E. R. et al. J. Org. Chem. 69, 8005–8011 (2004).
4. Heldebrant, D. J., Jessop, P. G., Thomas, C. A., Eckert, C. A.
& Liotta, C. L. J. Org. Chem. 70, 5335–5338 (2005).
5. Munshi, P., Main, A. D., Linehan, J., Tai, C. C. & Jessop, P. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 7963–7971 (2002).
Figure 1 | The ‘switching’ of a switchable solvent.
a, Protonation of DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo-[5.4.0]undec-7-ene) in the presence of an alcohol and
carbon dioxide is reversed when CO2 is removed.
b, Polarity switching in the reaction shown in a,
in which CO2 causes a nonpolar liquid (shown in
blue) mixture of hexanol and DBU to change over
one hour into a polar, ionic liquid (shown in red);
nitrogen gas reverses the process by stripping out
CO2 from the reaction. c, The different polarity of
each liquid under the two conditions is illustrated
by the miscibility of decane with the
hexanol/DBU mixture under nitrogen, before
exposure to CO2: however, decane separates out
once the mixture becomes polar in the presence
of CO2. Again, N2 reverses the process.
©2005 Nature Publishing Group
Supplementary information accompanies this
communication on Nature’s website.
Competing financial interests: declared none.
doi:10.1038/nature4361102a
Corrigendum
Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells
Byeong Chun Lee, Min Kyu Kim, Goo Jang, Hyun Ju Oh,
Fibrianto Yuda, Hye Jin Kim, M. Hossein Shamin, Jung Ju
Kim, Sung Keun Kang, Gerald Schatten, Woo Suk Hwang
Nature 436, 641 (2005)
This communication contains an error in the methods
section of the supplementary information. In the
description of the fusion protocol on page 3, line 2,
electrical pulses were delivered for 15 microseconds, and
not for 15 seconds as published.
Coments go here:
- Log in to post comments