Underwater Adhesive
Underwater Adhesive
US3896077
Year:
Abstract:
Pastes of alpha-cyanoacrylate acid esters and insoluble fillers can be applied to surfaces submerged in water for securing thereto, in situ, a wide variety of metallic and non-metallic substances.
Type of document:
Language:
United States Patent
Leonard et al.
H9]
[11] 3,896,077
* [451 July 22, 1975
/
I54)
I76]
[22]
[21]
1631
[521
l5l]
I58]
UNDERWATER ADHESIVE
lnventors: Fred Leonard, 7713 Beech Tree
Rd.. Bethesda. Md. 20034; George
Brandes. 30 Sidonia Ave, Coral
Gables. Fla. 33134
Filed: Nov. 30. 1970
Appl. No.: 93.903
Related U.S. Application Data
Continuation of Scr. No. 857,538. Sept. 12, 1969.
Pat. No. 3.607.542. which is a continuation~in—part of
Ser. No. 699.062, Jan. I9, I968. abandoned. which is
a continuation-in—part of Ser. No. 586,3l6. Oct. 10,
1966, abandoned.
U.S. Cl.. .......... .. 260/42.48; 156/285; l56/327;
I56/331; 260/4227; 260/7811 N
Int. Cl. .......................................... .. C08f 45/04
Field of Search. 260/41 A, 4| B, 4| C, 88.7 A,
260/78.4 N, 42.27, 42.48
{S6} References Cited
UNITED STATES PATENTS
2.784.|27 4/I957 Joyner ................................ ., I54/43
2.794.788 6/I957 Coover et al . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 260/l 7
2.833.753 5/I958 Lal . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. 260/89.5
3,350,372 l0/I957 Anspon et al , . . . . . . . . . .. 260/86,7
3.442.851 5/I969 McManimie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 260/41
3.485.790 l2/l969 Potter ................................. .. 260/41
Primary E.raminer—.|ames H. Derrington
Attorney. Agent, or Firm-—lrwin M. Aisenberg
[57] ABSTRACT
Pastes of a-cyanoacrylic acid esters and insoluble fill-
ers can be applied to surfaces submerged in water for
securing thereto, in situ, a wide variety of metallic and
non-metallic substances.
24 Claims, No Drawings
3,896,077
1
UNDERWATER ADHESIVE
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
APPLICATIONS
This is a continuation of Ser. No. 857.538 (now U.S.
Pat. No. 3.6()7.542). filed Sept. 12, 1969. which is a
continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 699.062, filed Jan. 19.
I968. now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part
of Ser. No. 586,3l6. filed Oct. I0, I966, now aban-
doned.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
I. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to compositions capable of
being applied to surfaces submerged in water to secure
together a wide variety of metallic and non-metallic
solid substances. e.g.. glass, aluminum. steel, stainless
steel, plastics, rubber and wood. The compositions of
this invention are useful for underwater repair of ships
and other structures, and sealing in place underwater
demolition charges and explosives. They also have
health field applications, e.g.. dental, such as fillings for
teeth; for this purpose n-butyl-a-cyanoacrylate is the
preferred monomer and calcium carbonate is the pre-
ferred filler. The invention includes the preparation
and a particular application of said compositions.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Adhesive compositions are generally useless for ap-
plication under water, in the main, because the film of
water on the substrate surface prevents its being wetted
by the adhesive. Previously known compositions either
dissolve in water. float away from the surfaces to be
joined or. in the case of various adhesive monomers.
polymerize instantaneously on contact with water or
too slowly to be of substantial utility.
Several prior art patents and publications in the field
of oz-cyanoacrylate adhesives are of interest. U.S. Pat.
No. 2,794,788 issued to Coover et al. on June 4, I957
(application filed Nov. I. I952) relates to adhesive
compositions containing certain monomeric esters of
a—cyanoacrylic acid and to their methods of use.
Coover et al. (‘788) describes adhesive compositions
which are stable in bulk, but which autopolymerize
when spread in a thin film and which chemically com-
prise a monomeric ester of oz-cyanoacrylic acid having
the general formula CH2 = C(CN)—COOR, wherein R
may be an alkyl group of I to I6 carbon atoms, cyclo-
hexyl or phenyl. The compositions additionally con-
tain. as a stabilizer against polymerization in bulk, sul-
fur dioxide in a concentration of 0.001 to 0.06% by
weight. The patent states that “viscosity regulators"
which are soluble in monomeric alkyl or-cyanoacrylates
may be employed in the adhesive compositions.
U.S. Pat. No. 2.765.332 issued to Coover et al. on
Oct. 2. I956 (application filed Feb. II. I954) de-
scribes an adhesive composition similar to Coover et al.
(‘788) but with the improvement of adding 0.001 to
0.05% by weight of hydroquinone as a stabilizer.
Coover et al. (‘332) also contains a similar description
of “viscosity regulators" (polymeric materials which
are soluble in the monomer).
U.S. Pat. No. 2,784,127 issued to Joyner and Coover
(Joyner et al.) on Mar. 5. 1957 (application filed June
2. I954) describes adhesive compositions using the
basic monomeric a-cyanoacrylate esters described in
the Coover et al. ('788 and '332) patents. but with the
improvement of adding one or more ester “plasticiz-
5
III
I5
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
2
ers" which are soluble in the or-cyanoacrylate monomer
as described therein. Joyner et al. also states that: “The
adhesive compositions can contain any of the other
compounding ingredients which are normally em-
ployed such as viscosity modifiers, coloring agents, fill-
ers, pigments and the like." (col. 5, lines 28-33). No
explicit exemplification is found for the term "fillers",
and the term "fillers". standing alone. would include
both water-soluble and monomer-soluble materials.
U.K. Pat. No. 1,000,665 filed in I962 by Eastman
Kodak Co. and published on Aug. I 1. I965, discloses
methods of using the basic adhesive compositions.
monomeric oz-cyanoacrylate esters described in the
Coover et al. (‘788 and ’332) patents, but with the ad-
ditional step of applying an epoxide to one of the sur-
faces to be bonded. This U.K. patent also describes
how the “monomers may be thickened by incorpora-
tion therein of polymeric materials . . .” (p. 3, line 24).
Finally in the prior art patents, U.S. Pat. No.
3.483,870 issued to Coover et al. on Dec. 16, I969 (ap-
plication filed Apr. 22, 1963) describes a method for
surgical bonding of body tissues which comprises ap-
plying to one of the tissue surfaces an adhesive compo-
sition comprising the basic monomeric esters described
in Coover et al. (’788 and ’332) and Joyner et al., and
the additional step of applying to one tissue surface a
basic organic nitrogen compound from the class con-
sisting of vasoconstrictors and local anesthetics.
Coover et al. (’870) also reiterates (at col. 5, lines
I-I 3) the monomer-soluble “suitable thickening agents
and viscosity modifiers" of Coover et al. (‘788 and
‘332) and the monomer-soluble “plasticizers" of
Joyner et al. Coover et al. (’870) states that surgical
grades of absorbable cellulose may be used “to absorb
body fluids and aid in obtaining a dry field for the adhe-
sive" (col. 5. lines 51-53). and the patent states that
“the presence of body fluids on the surfaces to be
joined has been a factor that has caused the a-cyanoac-
rylate monomers to be less successful as surgical adhe-
sives in some instances than would be desired“ (col. 2,
lines 35-39). This statement indicates the awareness in
the prior art of the water reactivity of the a-cyanoac-
rylate monomers. This means that in the presence of
water the monomers polymerize before the surfaces to
be bonded can be brought together.
It is interesting to note that the Coover et al. ( ‘788.
’332 and '870) patents. the Joyner et al. patent and the
U.K. patent are all assigned to Eastman Kodak Co. It
is also informative to mention some printed publica-
tions published by Eastman Kodak Co. on the subject
of Eastman 910 adhesive. Eastman 910 contains
methyl-at-cyanoacrylate, which may also be named as
methyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Eastman Kodak Bulletin No.
R-I03 (1958) has on p. 2 a discussion of “Preparation
of Bonding Surfaces", where it is stated: “As do most
adhesives. Eastman 910 Adhesive works best when the
bonding surfaces are thoroughly cleaned and dried
prior to the application of the adhesive." The foregoing
statement again demonstrates the prior art knowledge
that oz-cyanoacrylates react very rapidly and readily
with water-polymerizing before the surfaces to be
bonded can be brought together. Eastman Kodak Co.
published another brochure about Eastman 9I0 in
I966. This I966 publication discusses “Preparation of
Bonding Surfaces" on p. 4. where it is again stated:
“As with most adhesives. Eastman 910 Adhesive per-
forms best when it is used to bond surfaces which have
3,896,077
3
been thoroughly cleaned and dried prior to the applica-
tion of the adhesive." Further on p. 4. when discussing
the preparation of ALUMINUM surfaces for bonding,
the brochure states: “After being cleaned. the parts
should be rinsed with water and dried prior to the for-
mation of the bond.”
In summary. the prior art reveals that oz-cyanoac-
rylate ester monomers have been known for l5 years.
but none of the prior art suggests an adhesive composi-
tion which may be successfully applied in the presence
of water. While the prior art, such as Joyner et al..
broadly teaches “fillers". it has never occurred to those
skilled in the art to use a filler which is insoluble in
water and insoluble in the monomer to make a paste-
like composition which will bond under water.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The compositions of this invention contain, as essen-
tial ingredients, at least one liquid monomer of a class
known as oz-cyanoacrylic acid esters and at least one
water-insoluble weakly alkaline to acid filler which is,
effectively. inert with respect to the monomer and es-
sentially insoluble therein. The filler is admixed with
the liquid monomer to form a thickened paste-like mix-
ture which remains integral under water and does not
flow away from the site of application. Suitable pastes
contain, e.g., from I to 3 parts by weight of monomer.
from I to 3 parts by weight of filler and from 0 to 0.3
part by weight of finely divided silica.
Accordingly. it is an object of this invention to pro-
vide a composition which is an adhesive paste capable
of being applied to a surface submerged in water. An-
other object is to provide an adhesive mixture capable
of joining. in situ, two surfaces submerged in water. the
surfaces being of the same or different materials. A fur-
ther object is to provide an adhesive composition which
will neither dissolve in water. flow away from the site
of application in water, harden immediately on contact
with water nor take unduly long to harden when sub-
merged in water. An additional object is to provide an
adhesive mixture which. when applied under water, will
permit a reasonable working time for underwater appli-
cation and will harden substantially uniformly. A still
further object is to provide an underwater adhesive
which can develop high bond strengths within one min-
ute after application. These and other objects. readily
apparent with reference to the following description.
are achieved by the subject invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
EMBODIMENTS
The liquid ct-cyanoacrylate monomers used for this
invention are of the formula H2C=C(CN)—-CO—0R.
wherein R is, preferably. alkyl having from I to H) car-
bon atoms. e.g.. methyl. ethyl. propyl. isopropyl, butyl.
isobutyl, amyl. pentyl, hexyl. heptyl ethylhexyl. octyl.
nonyl and decyl. From among these. it is particularly
advantageous to employ those wherein R is alkyl hav-
ing from 4 to 8 carbon atoms. either straight or
branched chain. R is. alternatively. substituted alkyl
having from 1 to I0 carbon atoms. The substituents are
unlimited as long as the monomers are liquid. Illustra-
tive substituents are lower alkoxy having from 1 to 4
carbon atoms [ethoxyethyl-or-cyanoacrylateI and halo.
e.g., chloro and fluoro [trifluoro-isopropyl-on
cyanoacrylate]. (In the trifluoro-isopropyl group the
three fluorine atoms are bonded to the same carbon
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
65
4
atom.) In addition R can also be. e.g.. cyclohexyl. phe-
nyl or allyl. The sole restrictions on R are that the
monomer must be liquid at room temperature (20° C.)
and atmospheric pressure and a carbon atom of R must
be directly bound to the H-;C=C(CN)——CO—O—
group. It is also essential that the at-cyanoacrylate be
unsubstituted in the B—position. That means that the hy-
drogen atoms in the ,6-position cannot be replaced. The
contemplated a-cyanoacrylates must have the struc-
ture:
[3 (1
H,C'==C(CN)--C0—O—. without variation in this
portion of the molecule.
The liquid or-cyanoacrylates are monomers prepared.
e.g., according to the method disclosed by U.S. Pat.
No. 2,763,677 (hereafter: Jeremias). The precursors
are either known or are available from known starting
materials following published procedures. Where R is
alkyl, monomers prepared according to the Jeremias
procedure have purities of 98.5 per cent or higher.
The pH designated for the monomer is measured by
adding one gram of monomer and 0.2 gram of sodium
chloride to 50 cubic centimeters of water. The mixture
is then stirred and the pH checked with a standard pH
meter or other laboratory indicator. It has been found
that the pH is a critical factor. A range of from 2.45 to
4. l . preferably from 3.0 to 4.1, permits a good homoge-
nous mixture with inorganic fillers. such as calcium car-
bonate and amorphous silica. As the pH is increased
above 4.l . clumping occurs (depending upon the alka-
linity of the filler); at a pH below 3.7 homogenous
pastes are prepared. but delayed curing time results.
This is advantageous for those monomers which poly-
merize most rapidly on contact with water. These have
preferred pH‘s. e.g.. methyl-or-cyanoacrylate (pH
2.45), ethyl-at-cyanoacrylate (pH 2.7) and propyl-a-
cyanoacrylate (pH 2.7). below 3.7. It has also been
found that in particular aqueous media, e.g.. sea water
that has contamination of a type which is not readily
determined. tensile strengths may be improved by re-
ducing the pH below the range of from 3.7 to 4.1. Par-
ticular substrates. e.g.. HY-80 steel. also adhere more
strongly at lower pH’s. Propyl-a-cyanoacrylate has
been found to yield particularly good results (strong
bonds) with HY-80 steel.
The pH is controlled, e.g.. by adding sulfur dioxide to
the monomer during distillation in accord with Jere-
mias’ disclosure or by adding sulfur dioxide to the
monomer after distillation. In lieu of sulfur dioxide
other acidic inhibitors (against anionic polymeriza-
tion). such as nitric oxide. nitrous oxide, carbon diox-
ide. hydrogen fluoride. trichloroacetic acid and acetic
anhydride. can be used to stabilize the monomer. (Car-
bon dioxide is recommended only for monomers
wherein R has at least four carbon atoms.) In combina-
tion with the acidic inhibitor a free radical inhibitor.
such as hydroquinone. monomethylether of hydroqui-
none. picric acid and t-butyl-catechol. should be con-
currently employed. The monomethylether of hydro-
quinone is the preferred stabilizer against free radical
polymerization. Moreover. it imparts good color stabil-
ity to both the monomeric oz-cyanoacrylate and the po-
lymerized product therefrom. This has critical signifi-
cance in the health field. Free radical inhibition is ob-
tained with. e.g.. 10 parts of the monomethylether of
hydroquinone per million parts of at-cyanoacrylic acid
3,896,077
5
ester; in practice from l5 to 200 parts per million are
employed.
As the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain of
R is increased. the hydrophobicity of the monomers is
increased. The methyl. ethyl and propyl esters are rela-
tively hydrophillic and require a lower pH to make
their use practical. These, as the monomers in the paste
compositions at the above-noted preferred pH‘s, are
effectively delivered through, e.g., a polyethylene de-
livery tube to a surface of, e.g., a submerged steel jig to
be glued under water, a steel jig counterpart being im-
mediately placed on said delivered paste.
Although the butyl and amyl esters are more hydro-
phobic than the methyl, ethyl and propyl and generally
more satisfactory to use. the hexyl, heptyl and octyl-oz-
cyanoacrylates are‘ most satisfactory both from the
standpoint of optimum working time and resistance of
the resulting adhesive bond to subsequent hydrolytic
degradation.
The amyl and hexyl homologs are preferred for un-
derwater applications in view of their ease of handling,
preparation and obtainable tensile strengths.
The filler is insoluble weakly alkaline to acid material
essentially inert with respect to the liquid a-cyanoac-
rylate ester monomer. Exemplary fillers are calcium
carbonate, calcium sulfate dihydrate, calcium sulfate,
titanium dioxide. zinc oxide, zinc hydroxide, calcium
oxide. magnesium oxide, stannic oxide, stannous oxide.
aluminum oxide. aluminum silicate, calcium silicate,
zinc silicate, calcium aluminate, mercuric oxide. silver
oxide, cuprous oxide, cupric oxide, strontium oxide.
ferrous oxide. ferric oxide, zinc phosphate. calcium
phosphate. aluminum phosphate, talc. barium sulfate,
barium carbonate and calcium sulfate hemihydrate.
These are best employed in a finely divided state so that
they can most readily be admixed with the liquid mono-
mer to form a paste. The preferred fillers are those
which are neutral to weakly alkaline. Although silica
does not readily mix with monomer to form a paste, it
is advantageously employed in conjunction with other
fillers, e.g., to control the fluidity of the paste.
The preferred fillers are either calcium carbonate
alone or a mixture of calcium carbonate and amor-
phous silica. The preferred amorphous silica is a fine
colloidal size silica of 99% purity prepared in a rapid,
high temperature flame process as a white soot and sold
under the name “Cab-O-Sil" (trademark) by Geoffry
Cabot Company. For stable pastes with chemically
pure barium carbonate, the pH designated for the
A. n-butyl a-cyanoacrylate 3.0 grams (g)
Poly(methylmethacrylate) I molecular weight-— 0. l5 g
50.000 to 100.000]
Calcium carbonate — 2.7 g
Silica Up to 0.3 g as desired for
suitable paste
viscosity
B. Propyl or-eyanoacrylate 4 pt. 2.4 g
Polyester Resin (R and H) P-43 [O.75 to 080 pt.] 0.45 to 048 g
P-13 (0.25 to 0.20 pt] 0.l5to0.l2g
MEK Peroxide [002 pt.] 0.0012 g
Calcium Carbonate 2.7
monomer (according to the indicated testing proce-
dure) is optimally 3.0 for higher homologs, i.e., amyl
and above.
Although each of the above-noted fillers is inorganic
and inorganic fillers are preferred. organic fillers can
be used in lieu thereof. An organic filler can, but need
not, be a pigment, such as carbon black. Different cf-
5
l0
l5
20
30
35
40
45
50
65
6
fects are obtained with different fillers in different con-
centrations. The fillers are solids other than organic
polymers since the latter ordinarily are soluble in a-cy-
anoacrylates and therefore do not form suitable pastes.
All fillers which are (a) essentially inert with respect to
the employed oz-cyanoacrylate, (b) insoluble in the em-
ployed at-cyanoacrylate, (c) insoluble in water and (d)
form pastes with said oz-cyanoacrylate are effective in
forming compositions which are useful in adhering to-
gether two surfaces submerged in water.
The term “insoluble” is relative. Although it is said
that there is no substance which is completely insoluble
in water, the expression “water-insoluble“ is employed
in technical writings and is readily understood. The ex-
pression “water-insoluble+ is used herein to define fill-
ers having a water solubility (at room temperature) no
greater than 1 gram/l00 milliliters. For ease of han-
dling it is well to employ filler having a solubility in
water of less than 0.5 gram (g)/100 milliliters (ml) of
water or, preferably, less than 0.01 g/lO0 ml of water
at room temperature.
The filler must also be essentially insoluble in the
oz-cyanoacrylate so that the adhesive composition will
be in the form of a paste. By “paste" or “paste-like" is
meant a dispersion in a liquid at-cyanoacrylate of solid
particles of filler which is essentially insoluble therein.
The paste may vary in consistency. It is preferred that
the paste have only a slight tendency to flow of its own
volition and yet be such that it can readily be caused to
flow or spread. The paste should not be watery and
should remain integral when delivered to a submerged
substrate. Dispersions having the consistency of tooth-
paste or even more fluid are easiest to work with. The
paste preferably has a density greater than that of wa-
ter.
The particle size of the filler is not critical beyond the
general requirements for fillers in solid-in-liquid disper-
sions capable of flow. The range of average particle size
is ordinarily between l00 and 300 mesh. but a much
broader range is suitable for the intended purpose.
The underwater adhesive compositions are not lim-
ited to liquid—a—cyanoacrylate monomer and inorganic
(or organic) fillers. It is also possible to use a liquid
a-cyanoacrylate monomer having dissolved therein an
organic polymer, such as up to 10% by weight of
poly(methylmethacrylate) or po1y(a-alkyl cyanoac-
rylate) or up to 25% by weight of liquid unsaturated
polyester, and filler. Exemplary compositions of this
type are:
When formulation B is employed on painted surfaces
submerged in sea water, bond strengths of from 100 to
l25 pounds per square inch are obtained. [The abbre-
viation “pt." is used for parts by weight.]
The pastes of this invention are applied to a surface
submerged in water. as, e.g., a glob. (Said pastes are
equally effective in fresh water and in sea water.) The
3,896,077
7
other surface to be adhered is then pressed over the
glob against the first surface and held there for a period
of up to five minutes.
To deliver the paste to the surface to which it is to be
applied, it is preferably placed in a tube and squeezed
through a nozzle or throat onto said surface.
Tests were conducted with compositions of this in-
vention wherein (a) a second surface is immediately
pressed against a first surface to which paste has been
applied. (b) a second surface is pressed against a first
surface one minute after a glob of paste has been
placed on the first surface. and (c) a second surface is
pressed against a first surface two minutes after a glob
of paste has been placed on the first surface. all sur-
faces being submerged in water. The strength of the re-
sulting bonds was then tested. All bond tension tests
were carried out with a Baldwin Universal Testing Ma-
chine at a jaw separation speed of 0.05 inch per minute.
In the examples which follow, a paste is made by add-
ing the stated filler to the specified liquid a-cyanoac-
.a:_?.
ll)
15
20
8
rylate. When a plurality of fillers are used. they can be
admixed with the at-cyanoacrylate sequentially in any
order or as an admixture. In the actual examples. the
amorphous silica is added last. Alternatively. the mono-
mer can be added to the filler. The a-cyanoacrylate is
prepared according to the method of Jeremias (U.S.
Pat. No. 2,763,677) and contains an acidic inhibitor
against anionic polymerization. The pH designated for
said oz-cyanoacrylate (containing the acidic inhibitor)
is the pH obtained by mixing 1 gram of the a-cyanoac-
rylate and 0.2 gram of sodium chloride in 50 milliliters
ofdistilled water. Said pH is 3.7 except for Example l9.
where it is 3.0: Example 24. where it is 2.7; and Exam-
ple 39, where it is 4.15.
The paste formed from the admixture of filler with
the oz-cyanoacrylate (monomer) is stirred until smooth
and then placed in a squeeze tube from which it is
spread. under water. on one of the two surfaces to be
adhered. The other of said two surfaces is then pressed
for from two to three minutes against the paste on said
one surface.
Monomer‘ Average Bond
a—cyano- Filler‘ Paste Strength in
EXAMPLE acrylate grams Flow Surfaces“ Tension (psi)
l‘ octyl CaCO;, 3.4 201"
I I0“
SiO, 0.3 fair 187‘
2 ‘ hcptyl CaCO,-. 2. 7 excellent I00:
I75
250‘
3‘ heptyl CaC0;, 2.6 , 475“
Si0, 0.l to 410’
0.2
4 heptyl CaC03 3.4 609"
710"
5 heptyl CaCO_, 2.7 rubber/steel 74’
rubber/wood 3]’
glass/glass ‘
6’ hexyl CaC0, 2.5 good 225"
I35”
I 12 “
7‘ amyl C303; 3.5 fair 253'‘
80'’
150"
8‘ hutyl CaC0_, 2.0 ve thin 420"
an fluid
9 nonyl CaCO,-, 2.7 2 1 0
SiO, 0.05
l0 decyl CaC0.-. 2.7 200
SiO, 0.05
I l cyclohexyl CaCO_-. 2,7 885
SiO, 0.05
l 2 ethoxy- CaCO, 2.7 270
ethyl
SiO, 0.]
1 3 isobutyl C aCO;. 2.7 g 260
Si0, 0.05
l 4 isopropyl C aCO:. 2. 7 360
Si0, 0.05
15 2-ethyl- CaC0,1 2. 7 3 l0
hexyl
SiO, 0.05
I6 propyl' CaCO.1 2. 6 200
SiO, 0.]
l7 ethyl‘ C aCO.1 2.7 75
SiO, 0.!
I 8 methyl‘ CaCO3 2.7 75
$0; 0.]
I9 hexyl BaCO;. 2.7 750
sio. 0.1
20 2-elhyl- CaSO. 2H,O 2.0 210
hexyl
SiO, 0.]
2| butyl CaSO. ‘kH«_»0 3.0 80
SiO; ().l
22 allyl CaCO, 2,7 250
SiO, 0.1
23 n—hexyl and BaCO. 2.7 400
n-amyl
SiO, 0.l
3,896,077
Tablc —('onlinucd
Monomer’ Average Bond
a-cyano- Filler‘ Paste Strength in
EXAMPLE acrylate grams Flow Surfaces*“ Tension (psi)
24 trifluoro- CaCO;. 2 , 7 l 55
isopropyl
SiO, 0.]
"All examples adhere two stainless steel surfaces under fresh water. unless otherwise specified
‘Salt water used in this sample
“Immediate sealing
‘Scaling after a l-minute immersion
‘Scaling after a 2-minute immersion
“Glass slides broke. precluding reading
'Bond strengths as high as 5ll(l psi obtained in individual tests
’Pee| strength; rubber pccled from steel and wood substrates
‘Held together for only one minute under water
‘Paste delivered as a glob through a polyethylene tube to one of the two steel surfaces held under water
‘All silica (Si0.,.) used in the examples in conjunction with the filler is amorphous silica
‘In each example 3.0 grams of monomer are used, except in Example I where 6.! grams of monomer are used; in Example 23. L5
grams of each monomer are employed. Each alkyl is normal unless otherwise specified.
Heptyl-ot—cyanoacrylate admixed with calcium car-
bonate (CaCO;.) and amorphous silica (as in the exam-
ples) was also found to form strong bonds (under wa-
ter) of aluminum to aluminum. in the same manner
wood/wood and rubber/rubber bonds were formed. Al-
though there may be some variation in maximum ten-
sile or shear strengths and the optimum pH may differ,
strong bonds are likewise formed under water for
glass/glass, plastic/plastic (phenol/formaldehyde ther-
moset plastic) and combinations of the noted sub-
strates, e.g., steel/aluminum. plastic/glass and wood!-
painted steel.
Employing a paste prepared from 4.0 parts by weight
of hexyl- a-cyanoacrylate (pH 3.7), 3.6 parts by weight
of calcium carbonate and 0.2 part by weight of “Cab-
O-Sil", additional bonds are prepared under water as
set forth in Examples 25 to 32. In these examples all
test specimens (except those with corroded or painted
surfaces) are prepared for adhesive bonding by vapor
degreasing for five minutes with trichloroethylene. This
is followed by a hot water rinse and then a final wash
in methyl ethyl ketone.
The procedure for each test (run) in Examples 25 to
32 is as follows:
a. Water in a container is regulated at the indicated
temperature;
b. Test specimens are submerged in the water;
c. Adhesive is applied to bonding surface of one sub-
merged test specimen;
d. Adhesive is spread over entire bonding area by
sliding test specimens over one another;
e. Moderate hand pressure (approximately 1 pound)
is applied between bonding surfaces for a time in-
terval A;
f. Bonded test specimens removed from water and
placed in Dillon Dynamometer for pull tests;
g. Load applied between test specimens; time interval
B is the interval between conclusion of time inter-
val A and application of load.
The adhesive cure begins immediately upon Contact
with water. Up to two minutes are available following
application to spread the adhesive and bring the bond-
ing surfaces together.
All ingredients are stored in closed containers. The
hexyl-ct-cyanoacrylate is packaged in a polyethylene
bottle. Cardboard cans are used to package the amor-
phous silica and the calcium carbonate.
The mixed adhesive paste can be readily applied
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
60
65
from its collapsible squeeze tube container for a period
up to four hours.
The following portions of Federal Test Standard l75,
Adhesive Methods of Testing, are used for performing
the physical tests:
Method 101 l. l-Tensile Properties of Adhesives
Method 1033.1-T-Shear Strength Properties of Ad-
hesives by Tensile Loading.
All tests for each example are performed on the same
day with the same adhesive batch. The bond area for
each test is one square inch. 7.8 grams of mixed adhe-
sive composition is adequate for approximately 20 thin
film tests.
The aluminum alloy employed in each of Examples
25 through 32 is aluminum alloy AA606l-T6 anodized
per Mil-A-8625 and having a surface roughness of "2.
In each of said examples the steel is steel per Mil-S-
16216, Grade HY-80; in Examples 25, 28. 29, 31 and
32 the surface roughness is 32; in Examples 26 and 30
the surface bonded is badly oxidized to a finish of ap-
proximately '2’; in Example 27 the surface bonded is
painted per NAVORD USTD 52, System No. 48(anti-
fouling).
EXAMPLE 25
Steel is adhered to anodized aluminum alloy sub-
merged in a 3% solution of salt (NaCl) water having a
temperature of 70°F. Ten repetitions produce the fol-
lowing results: ‘
A‘ B" Tensile Strengths
(psi)
at 45 37 90
b 45 75 375
c 45 48 190
d 45 Bl 325
e 45 55 425
l’ 45 44 275
g 45 57 450
A 45 42 I25
I_ 45 62 475
_| 45 47 625
Average 335
"lime in seconds to prepare specimen bond
“Tinu: in seconds (unless otherwise specified) from bond preparation to the
upplication of loud in lusting,
EXAMPLE 26
Badly oxidized steel is adhered to anodized alumi-
num alloy submerged in tap water having a tempera-
ture of 70° F. [in this example and in Examples 27
through 32 A and B have the same meanings as indi-
3,896,077
11
cated in the respective footnotes in Example 25.] Five
tests yield the following results:
A B Tensile Strengths
(psi!
a 45 I05 390
h 45 I05 290
c 45 I05 440
d 45 l(l5 450
e 45 I05 475
Average 409
EXAMPLE 2 7
Painted steel is adhered to anodized aluminum alloy
submerged in tap water having a temperature of 70° F.
In each of five tests A is 45 seconds and B is 105 sec-
onds; the respective tensile strengths are 240 psi. 225
psi, 230 psi. 265 psi and 320 psi. An average tensile
strength of 256 pounds per square inch is thus ob-
tained.
EXAMPLE 28
Steel is adhered to anodized aluminum alloy sub-
merged in tap water having a temperature of 70° F. In
each of ten tests A is 45 seconds. Other data follow:
B Tensile Strength
(psi)
a {ll 400
h 109 740
c 69 420
d 71 90
e 44 620
f 54 9 Ill
g l()4 525
h 75 680
i 76 6H]
j 47 625
Average 562
EXAMPLE 29
In Examples 29 to 32 shear specimens are ‘prepared
from rectangular slides having an overlapping bond
area of I inch”. Adhesive paste of the same ‘composi-
tion as that employed for Examples 25 to 28 is applied
to the slides in the same manner as it is applied to the
substances therein indicated. The details of Example
29 are the same as those of Example 28 except as oth-
erwise specified. In each of ten tests A is 45 seconds
and B is I05 seconds. The respective shear strengths in
pounds per square inch are: 500, 260, 345, 365. 410.
415, 230, 280, 320 and 440, the average of which is
361 psi.
EXAMPLE 30
Badly oxidized steel is adhered to anodized alumi-
num alloy submerged in tap water having a tempera-
ture of 70° F. In each of ten runs A is 45 seconds and
B is I05 seconds. The respective shear strengths in
pounds per square inch are: 405, 4l5. 430, 475. 405.
460. 465, 425, 400 and 410. the average of which is
429 psi.
EXAMPLE 3|
Steel having a surface roughness oi" "2 is adhered to
anodized aluminum alloy submerged in tap water'hav-
ing a temperature of 32° F. In each of ten runs A is 45
l0
l5
2()
30
35
40
45
50
60
65
12
seconds and B is 105 seconds. The respective shear
strengths in pounds per square inch are: 355. 275. 395.
270, 350, 445, 340. 430. 135 and 430, the average of
which is 342 psi.
EXAMPLE 32
Steel is adhered to anodized aluminum alloy sub-
merged in tap water having a temperatu re of 70°F. For
these tests the thickness of the adhesive layer between
the two substrates is 0.062 inch. In each of three runs
A is I220 seconds and B is 60 minutes. The respective
shear strengths in pounds per squard inch are: 65. I 10
and 75. the average of which is 83 psi.
EXAMPLES 33 to 38
Following the same procedure as that employed for
Examples I to 24 and using a paste prepared from 3.0
grams of n-hexyl-oz-cyanoacrylate. 2.7 grams of chemi-
cally pure (C.P.) calcium carbonate and 0.l gram of
amorphous silica, bonds are made under tap water in
less than I minute between standard A.S.T.M. I-inch
square jigs of the stated materials. Resulting tensile
strengths are noted in pounds per square inch in the fol-
lowing table: ‘
Example Substrates Tensile Strength
(psi)
33 wood to wood (maple) 300 370
34 plastic to plastic (phenolic) 250 270
3.5 rubber stopper to wood (maple) ll‘
36 rubber to steel 74*
37 painted steel to painted steel fi8()
38 aluminum to aluminum 340
iiott-. ‘Tlii: result is actually that for u peel test since the rubber stretches and peels
from the siibstralt: to which it is udhcrcd
EXAMPLE 39
Following the same procedure as that employed for
Examples I to 24 and using paste prepared from 3.0 g
of hexyl oz-cyanoacrylate and L0 g of dccolorizing
charcoal (Atlas Chemical Co., Wilmington, Delaware).
bonds made under tap water in less than I minute be-
tween standard A.S.T.M. I-inch square stainless steel
jigs displayed tensile strengths of I40 psi.
EXAMPLE 40
EXPERIMENTAL
I. Compositions (a) through (Ii) in the table below
were prepared with n-hexyl-a-cyanoacrylate having a
pH of 3.l7. To this monomer the indicated amount of
calcium carbonate (CaCO;,) was added; the monomer
and CaC0_-, were admixed until the resultant was essen-
tially uniform. The specified amount of amorphous sil-
ica (SiO,) was then thoroughly admixed therewith to
form as smooth and as homogeneous a product as pos-
sible with a spatula. The pH was determined in the
manner set forth earlier.
The product was then placed in a squeeze tube with
a nozzle from which it was spread. under water. directly
on a first planar vertical surface of a stainless steel
specimen. A corresponding planar vertical surface of a
second stainless steel specimen also under water was
then pressed for 30 seconds against the first planar sur-
face.
3,896,077
13
All procedures and starting materials were essentially
identical except insofar as differences are specifically
noted.
II. A 10% (w/v) solution of polymethylmethacrylate
(L.D.Caulk Co.) in n-hexyl-a-cyanoacrylate was pre-
pared. The solution was placed in a squeeze tube with
a nozzle and applied as in I to adhere two stainless steel
specimens together. After bringing the two planar spec-
imen surfaces together, however. the surfaces were
held together for 10 minutes.
TESTS
Each pair of stainless steel specimens which adhered
together were subjected to tensile tests. The results are
shown in the following table:
COM POSITIONS AND RESULTS
l. Monomer Sit), C aCO;, Dispersion Adhesion
gramslg) (g) (g) (psi)
(a) .10 0.1 I .0 watery 0‘
(b) 3.0 0.2 1.0 thin paste 200
(C) 3.0 0.2 2.0 paste I40
(d) 3.0 0.2 3.0 paste I60
(e) 3.0 0.2 4.0 paste I35
(f) 3.0 0.2 5.0 thick paste 35
(3) 3.0 0.2 6.0 thick paste 30
(h) 3.0 0.2 7.() friable mass’ 0
note:
‘did not wet stainless steel surface
-‘wry thick; not smooth.
F.ach paste ltbl lo (g)l wettcd and held to the surface to which it was applied.
DISCUSSION
The selected or-cyanoacrylate and pH are typical, as
are dispersions with the amorphous silica and the cal-
cium carbonate actually employed. The compositions
were prepared. not to achieve the highest possible ad-
hesion, but to demonstrate the entire range of disper-
sions from that which is clearly fluid. through a range
of paste-like compositions. to a very thick friable mass.
There is no reason to believe that any other inert water-
and monomer-insoluble filler(s) would present a differ-
ent over-all result.
The amounts of monomer and silica were selected in
an attempt to keep these figures constant. Since com-
position (b) was already a paste. the amount of silica
therein was reduced to obtain the closest comparable
composition which could not be considered a paste.
Polymethylmethacrylate is soluble in the monomer
and thus forms a solution. rather than a dispersion. with
the monomer. Since the polymethylmethacrylate is
solid. increasing the proportion thereof results in the
preparation of a gel. The polymethylmethacrylate em-
ployed is representative of monomer-soluble fillers and
there is no reason to believe that any other monomer-
soluble filler would yield a different result.
Stainless steel test specimens were selected as having
typical non-porous inert surfaces which could be and
were made uniformly planar so that the testing condi-
tions would be as uniform as possible. All test surfaces
were thoroughly cleaned. There is no reason to believe
that any other non-porous inert planar surface would
yield materially different results as long as the material
could withstand the force required to measure the ad-
hesion of the formed bond.
The surface to which each composition was applied
was maintained in a vertical position so that the results
l0
15
20
30
40
45
50
55
60
65
14
obtained would be independent of the relative density
of the composition to that of the water.
All paste or paste-like compositions remained inte-
gral when delivered to the submerged substrate to
which they were applied under water. The dispersion
with O. I gram of silica (a) was a fluid mix with a watery
consistency. The composition with 7 grams of calcium
carbonate (/1) could not truly be regarded as a disper-
sion; it was more nearly composed of monomer-wetted
clumps of filler particles.
Dispersion (:1 ) did not remain integral adjacent the
surface to which it was applied.
The paste or paste-like compositions are smooth and
uniform; they wet and adhere to a non-porous surface
to which they are applied under water. They are useful
to adhere together substrates which are submerged in
water, whereas neither watery dispersions eg. (a). nor
friable masses, e.g.. (I2), are useful from a practical
standpoint for such purpose.
Fillers which are soluble in the monomer form solu-
tions with the monomer and do not yield useful under-
water adhesives.
Compositions of this invention have a paste-like con-
sistency and are capable of ( 1 ) being applied to a sub-
strate submerged in water, (2) adhering together two
substances submerged in water and (3) achieving a
bond strength between the two substrates of at least
I00 pounds per square inch in less than 1 hour.
To one versed in the adhesive art. it is exceedingly
surprising that strong adhesive bonds can be achieved
under water. It is also surprising, knowing the proper-
ties of methyl-a-cyanoacrylate. that this family of an-
ionically initiated monomers may be utilized at all
under water at neutral or alkaline pH. It had generally
been accepted that the methyl ester was too reactive in
water. The longer chain esters. however, permit more
working time for the preparation of good adhesive
joints.
The invention and its advantages are readily under-
standable from the foregoing description. It is apparent
that various changes may be made in the processes and
compositions without departing from the spirit and
scope of the invention or sacrificing its material advan-
tages. the processes and compositions hereinbefore de-
scribed being merely illustrative of preferred embodi-
ments of the invention.
We claim:
1. A composition having a paste-like consistency and
containing. as essential ingredients. (a) at least one
B-unsubstituted on-cyanoacrylic acid ester which is liq-
uid at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. the
at-cyanoacrylic acid ester consisting of the acyl group
H,C=C(CN)—CO——O— and a group a carbon atom of
which is directly bound to the available bond of an oxy-
gen atom of said acyl group. and (b) water-insoluble
solid filler which is essentially inert with respect to the
a-cyanoacrylic acid ester and insoluble therein. the
filler being capable of forming a paste-like consistency
with the oz-cyanoacrylic acid ester and being present in
the composition in an amount sufficient to form the
paste-like consistency.
2. A composition according to claim 1 having I to 3
parts by weight of the ester. from I to 3 parts by weight
of the filler and from 0 to 0.3 part by weight of finely
divided silica.
3. A composition according to claim 2 wherein each
ester is an alkyl ester.
3,896,077
15
4. A composition according to claim 3 wherein the
alkyl of at least one ester has from I to 3 carbon atoms.
5. A composition according to claim 4 wherein the
sole ester is propyl-or-cyanoacrylate.
6. A composition according to claim 3 wherein the
alkyl of at least one ester has from 4 to 8 carbon atoms.
7. A composition according to claim 2 wherein each
a-cyanoacrylic acid ester is a monomer of the formula
H2C=C(CN)——CO—OR
wherein R is a member selected from the group consist-
ing of alkyl having from l to 10 carbon atoms; alkoxy-
alkyl having from I to l() atoms. the alkoxy having
from I to 4 carbon atoms; cyelohexyl; phenyl and ally].
8. A composition according to claim 7 in which said
filler comprises at least one member selected from the
group consisting of calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate
dihydrate, calcium oxide, calcium sulfate, titanium di-
oxide. zinc oxide, zinc hydroxide. magnesium oxide.
stannic oxide. stannous oxide, aluminum oxide. alumi-
num silicate, calcium silicate, zinc silicate, calcium alu-
minate, mercuric oxide. silver oxide, cuprous oxide, cu-
pric oxide, strontium oxide, ferrous oxide, ferric oxide.
zinc phosphate. calcium phosphate. aluminum phos-
phate, talc. barium sulfate. barium carbonate and cal-
cium sulfate hemihydrate.
9. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the
filler is inorganic and weakly alkaline.
10. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the
filler is inorganic and neutral.
11. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the
filler is inorganic and acidic.
12. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the
filler comprises at least one member selected from the
group consisting of calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate
hemihydrate. calcium sulfate dihydrate. calcium sulfate
and barium carbonate.
l()
15
20
30
35
40
50
55
60
16
13. A composition according‘ to claim 2 containing
finely divided amorphous silica.
14. A composition according to claim 2 having from
0 to 0.2 part by weight of finely divided silica and
wherein the oz-cyanoacrylic acid ester has an acidic in-
hibitor content such that one gram of said ester ad-
mixed with 0.2 gram of sodium chloride and 50 millili-
ters of water results in an admixture having a pH from
2.45 to 4.].
15. A composition according to claim l3 wherein the
sole oz-cyanoacrylic acid ester is n-butyl-a-
cyanoacrylate.
16. A composition according to claim 13 wherein the
sole oz-cyanoacrylic acid ester is isobutyl-on
cyanoacrylate.
17. A composition according to claim 13 wherein the
sole a-cyanoacrylic acid ester is amyl-oucyanoacrylate.
18. A composition according to claim 13 wherein the
sole oz-cyanoacrylic acid ester is hexyl-oz-cyanoacrylate.
19. A composition according to claim 14 wherein the
sole at-cyanoacrylic acid ester is heptyl—ot-
cyanoacrylate.
20. A composition according to claim 14 wherein the
sole as-cyanoacrylic acid ester is octyl-oz-cyanoacrylate.
21. A composition according to.claim 14 wherein the
sole at-cyanoacrylic acid ester is 2-ethylhexyl-cw
cyanoacrylate.
22. A process for preparing a composition according
to claim 14 which comprises admixing the a-cyanoa-
crylic acid ester with the filler and any silica until a
smooth paste is obtained.
23. A composition according to claim I containing a
free-radical-inhibiting amount of monomethylether of
hydroquinone.
24. A composition according to claim 1 consisting
essentially of ingredients (:1) and (b).
* it * 3|! *
F(’g;;g§0 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
It is certified that error appears in the above—identified patent
and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
-1
Column l, line 50, "0.00l" should read —-0.00lZ——; line 57, "0.00l" should
read ——0.00l%--.
B a
Column 4, lines 11 and 12, "H2C=C(CN)" should read
8 a
——H2C=C(CN)——. Column 6, line 15, "+is" should read ——" is-—. Column 10,
32 2
line 35, " " should read ——\\a///-—; line 38, "is 32" should read --is\\ia//--g
line 40, "125" should read —-‘\iE§/ ——. Column 11, line 47, "substances"
shculd read ——substrates——; line 65, "32" should read ——\\EB//-—. Column 13,
lines 31 and 32, "DISCUSSION" should read —-
II. The polymethylmethacrylate solution was thick and viscous. No adhesion
was obtained even after holding the surfaces together for ten minutes.
DISCUSSION--.
Column 15, line 13, "atoms" should read -—carbon atoms--.
Signcd and Sealed this
twenty-seventh Day Of ApriI1976‘
[SEAL]
A (test:
RUTH 9- MASON C. MARSHALL DANN
fnlmnng Offi-My (“""'"I'5-5'l'UI1¢’r 0]" Purellts and Trademarks
L. _|
Coments go here:
- Log in to post comments