Adhesive Bond Properties of Ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate Modified with Poly(methylmethacrylate)
Adhesive Bond Properties of Ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate Modified with Poly(methylmethacrylate)
Folder:
Journal:
Year:
Article keywords:
Abstract:
The mechanical properties of the adhesively bonded joints with ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate and ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate modified with poly(methylmethacrylate) were determined. The modifier lowers tensile stiffness, increases deformability and relaxation of the adhesive bond and improves impact resistance. A morphological structure similar to an interpenetrating network system is suggested which arises from the rapid polymerization of the solvent. The results obtained may be helpful for the design of joints with cyanoacrylate bonding.
DOI:
10.1080/00218468808071265
Type of document:
Language:
J4 Adhesion, W88, Vol. 25. pp. 2A5—Z53
Reprints available directly irom the publisher
Photocopying permitted by license only
© 1933 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Inc.
Printed in the United Kingdom
Adhesive Bond Properties of Ethyl-
2-cyanoacrylate Modified with
Po|y(methy|methacry|ate)
C4 PETROV. B. SERAFIMOV and D. KOTZEV
Scientific Industrial Centre for Special Polymers, Kliment Ohridski St 4A, 1 155
sorva, Bulgaria
(Received June 30, 1987; in fimzlftzrm October 26, I937}
The mechanical properties of the adhesively bonded joints with ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate
and ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate modified with poly(methy|methacryIaIe) weie determined.
The modifier lowers tensile stifiness, increases deformahility and relaxation of the
adhesive bond and improves impact resistance. A morphological structure similar to
an interpenetrating network system is suggested which arises trom the rapid
polymerization or the solvent. The results obtained may he helplul for the design or
joints with cyanaacrylate bonding.
KEY WORDS Adhesively banded joints‘ cyanaacrylate; ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate;
PMMA; mechanical properties; glass transition: interpenetrating network.
INTRODUCHON
The ability of cyanoacrylates to bond most materials in seconds has
produced spectacular growth in their production and application.‘
One of the ways to overcome the poor impact resistance of their
adhesive-bonded joints has been the introduction of polymer
modifiers into the cyanoacrylate monomer. Poly(methy|meth-
acrylate),2 po1y(butadiene-co-acrylonitrilef and copolymers of
methyl acrylate and ethylene‘ are some of the polymer modifiers
which were found to decrease the brittleness of the resultant bond.
245
246 C. PETROV. B. SERAFIMOV AND K. KOTZEV
The aim of this paper is to study the influence of poly(methyl-
methacrylate) modifier of ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate on the stiffness,
strength, deformation characteristics and relaxation properties of
the resultant adhesive bond between steel specimens.
EXPERIMENTAL
100% GC pure ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate (ECA) was obtained by
distillation of the commercial product Kanokonlit E. It was stabi-
lized with 250 ppm hydroquinone and 200 ppm p-toluenesulfonic
acid. Modified adhesives were obtained by dissolving specified
amounts of poly(methylmethacrylate) into the ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate
monomer by mixing at 50°C. The poly(methyl methacrylate)
(PMMA) was commercial grade bulk polymer with molecular mass
of 1.5 x 10‘.
All mechanical tests were performed on steel (0.Z%C content)
bonded joints. The surfaces to be bonded were roughened with Igel
400 sandpaper and degreased with trichloroethylene. Chemical
treatment or activation were not employed. Universal testing
machine Zwick 1474 was used. Tensile shear strength was deter-
mined in accordance with ASTM D-1002 on single overlap specim-
ens. After adhesive application the joint was clamped and left for
24h at 20—22°C and 55-65% relative humidity. The crosshead
speed of testing was 50mm/min. The reported values are the
averages of 15 tests. Tensile strength was determined in accordance
with ASTM D2095 on cylindrical specimens. No clamping was
employed. All other conditions were as specified above. Impact
strength was determined in accordance with ASTM 950-72. The
test specimen for shear strain determination had dimensions shown
on Figure 1.5" The thickness of the glue-line (0.05 mm) was
controlled with the use of calibrated copper wire. The test specimen
for tensile strain determination is shown on Figure 2.7 This
multilayer structure was chosen because it provides a means for
increasing the absolute value of deformation within measurable
limits. All adhesive layers had a thickness of 0.05 mm controlled
with calibrated copper wire.
To obtain the necessary co-axiality a specially cut Teflon jacket
was used for assembly of the specimens after adhesive application.
MODIFIED ETHYL-Z-CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVES 247
i .
I /
\\
\i2i
FIGURE 1 Test specimens for shear strain determination (Rel. 5,6) (Dimensions
in mm)
For determination of the real proportionality limit in the stress-
strain dependence a cycle of "loading-pause-unloading-pause" was
employed. The rate of loading and unloading was 0.025 mm/min.
The loaded pause (600 sec) was used as the criterion for appearance
of visco-elastic strain. The unloaded pause (600 sec), on the other
hand, was a measure of the reversibility of the strain. Strain was
measured with an lnstron G-51-11-M extensiometer and the
strain/time dependence was recorded with the help of additional
Tacussel EPL-2 recorder. Relaxation experiments were conducted
on bonded specimens with dimensions according to ASTM D1002.
The bonded specimens were loaded in tension with 100 mm/min
{.4
FIGURE 2 Test specimens tor tensile strain determination (Ref. 7) (Dimensions
in mm)
248 C. PETROV, E. SERAFIMOV AND K. KUTZEV
crosshead speed at 22 + 1°C to a constant strain and kept there for
60sec. The time required for achievement of stress equilibrium was
recorded. The relaxation time was calculated by the following
formula:
0 : (10 e'‘’’ (1)
where r~relaxation time
a.,—initial stress at time t= 0
a—stress after time interval 2
The calorimetric experiments were conducted on a Perkin-Elmer
DSC-2C. The samples used were from the adhesive layer, removed
after failure of bonded joints. The scanning rate was 20 deg/min.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 3 shows the stress—strain curves for bonded joints in the shear
tensile loading mode. In the case of the bond based on pure ECA
22
\
\
a my H1 ,2 w ~s.
sw:mu‘a i
FIGURE 3 Stress-strain relationship in shear mode for cyanoaclylaze adhesive
hands l—pure ECA 2—ECA containing 4 wI,% PMMA
MODIFIED ETHYL-2»CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVES 249
02
SYFHS5 lNFu‘
\
\n
3 1/
\%
4 .
lwr In
flantenv oi Dol)‘l’"9"‘:/lmethaer)mtel
FIGURE 5 Tensile stillness of bonded joints as function of PMMA content in ECA
4. The linear relationship is maintained until 63% of failure stress is
reached for pure ECA bond (curve 1) and 56% of failure stress for
the modified ECA bond (curve 2). The visco-elastic strain com-
ponent is registered in the stress interval 63-80% of failure for the
ECA bond and 56-70% of failure for the modified ECA bond.
Creep is registered at stress above 80% and 70% of failure stress,
respectively. At failure, the strain for the pure ECA bond is 1.0%
and 1.8% for the modified ECA bond. When the data for shear and
tension are compared it is evident that the strain of the adhesive
bond in the shear mode is one magnitude higher than that in the
tensile mode. The incroporation of PMMA into the ECA adhesive
increases the susceptibility of the bond to deformation.
Figure 5 shows the data for the stiffness or modified and
unmodified ECA bonds. The stifiness values were determined from
the mid—range of the linear proportionality part of the stress-strain
relationship. Tensile stiflness falls by almost half upon modification
MODIFIED ETHYL-2-CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVES 2st
TABLE I
Physico-mechanical properties ofetltyl 2-cyanoaerylate adhesive bonded joints
Strain Strain
Tensile at at
shear failure Tensile tnitnre Impact Tensile
strength (shear) strength (tension) strength stittness
Adhesive (MPa) (%) (MPa) (%) (tr!/in‘) (MP2)
ECA 19 24 30 1.0 4.3 2400
ECA oontg. 19 30 30 1.3 5.2 I303
4wt.%i>MMA
t:
q
3 2
mm ,
at
E 4
~«:
5 ./
‘s . /
um -
Q /
2
o 2
/ X. 3
2410, I /
3 / «— sci:
'49 . 2—££u~mPMMI:'
3— E12/1»/«Z twin
:7 I17 20 an m 547 so 70 3
Reialtve strum, 7. ‘M
FIGURE 6 Stress relaxation at constant strain of ECA adhesive bonds
252 C. PETROV, B. SERAFIMOV AND K. KOTZEV
M:AL/ 5::
§
r— ECA
2— ECA . a-/. sum:
non
3m 3&0 350 sen Lao an an ass
YEMDERMUFE Mi
FIGURE 7 Glass-transition of ECA adhesive bonds
of the adhesive with PMMA, then levels off and is not further
considerably lowered with the increase of polymer modifier quan-
titiy above 2 wt.%.
The influence of PMMA modifier is demonstrated also by the
mechanical properties of the adhesive joint, summarized in Table 1.
The introduction of a small amount of PMMA does not reduce
the tensile or shear strength but increases the impact strength of the
bond and its deforrnability.
The data for stress relaxation at constant strain (Fig. 6) show a
lower relaxation time for the bond based on modified cyano-
acrylate. These results correlate well with the DSC study of
adhesive removed from the bond layer (Fig. 7). The glass—transition
of the ECA adhesive bond is 127°C. The bond containing 3wt.%
PMMA shows a T3 of 111°C. The specific heat of the glass—transition
of the modified adhesive is half of that for the ECA. This shows
that the incorporation of high molecular mass PMMA into ECA
produces a mild plasticization of the adhesive bond.
The higher defonnation susceptibility, the lower stiffness, in-
creased relaxation ability and single glass-transition point of the
t
i
1
3
MODIFIED ETI>{YL«2«CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVES 253
adhesive based on ECA modified with PMMA lead to the assump-
tion that a morphological structure, similar to that of an inter-
penetrating network system may be formed, as a result of the rapid
polymerization of the PMM’s solvent.
The data obtained in this study provide the necessary information
for practical stress determination in designing cyanocrylate bonded
joints bearing statis loads.
Relovanees
. Japan /wt. Ind, Book (Tokyo, was), p.57.
. D. L. Kotzev and L. B. Diclteva, 1:1 Nat. can/. Chemistry (Sofia. 1955), p. 415.
. v. Kabaivanov, D. Kotzev er n!., Bulgarian Pntertt 29, 439, (1979).
. .l. 1. O'Connor. US Patent 4, 440, 910, (1954).
A t. P. Jeandrau, Int. 1. Adh Adhesives o(4), 229431 (1986).
. w. Altltofarvd w. Brockntann, Adh. Age zttm), 27 (1977).
. A. E. Freidin, Strength and Durability nfAdIte.n'v: Jairtt: (Hintia, Moscow, 1981),
pp. ll3—ll4.
~to»tnA(»--—-
Coments go here:
- Log in to post comments