Revisions to the Microstructural Assignments of Poly(Ethyl Cyanoacrylate)
Revisions to the Microstructural Assignments of Poly(Ethyl Cyanoacrylate)
Folder:
Journal:
Year:
Article keywords:
Abstract:
The tacticity assignments from the literature for the 13C-NMR signals of the side-chain methylene group of poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate) are reversed, and new assignments of the main-chain methylene group are proposed. The assignments were made possible by a combination of DEPT and HETCOR NMR experiments on samples of varying microstructure distributions. The polymer tends toward syndiotacticity, not isotacticity as previously reported. The distribution of stereoisomers fits well to a Bernoulian statistical model. The stereochemical assignments were corroborated by similar analyses of a model compound for two cyanoacrylate repeat units.
DOI:
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(199907
Type of document:
Language:
Revisions to the Microstructural Assignments
of Poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate)
DOUGLAS R. ROBELLO, TERESA D. ELDRIDGE, FRANK M. MICHAELS
Eastman Kodak Company, Research Laboratories, Rochester, New York 14650-2116
Received 4 August 1998; accepted 4 December 1998
The tacticity assignments from the literature for the 13C-NMR signals of
the side-chain methylene group of poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate) are reversed, and new
assignments of the main-chain methylene group are proposed. The assignments were
made possible by a combination of DEPT and HETCOR NMR experiments on samples
of varying microstructure distributions. The polymer tends toward syndiotacticity, not
isotacticity as previously reported. The distribution of stereoisomers fits well to a
Bernoulian statistical model. The stereochemical assignments were corroborated by
similar analyses of a model compound for two cyanoacrylate repeat units. © 1999 John
ABSTRACT:
Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 2219 –2224, 1999
Keywords:
polycyanoacrylate; tacticity; microstructure; stereochemistry; NMR;
DEPT; HETCOR; model compound; dimer
INTRODUCTION
As part of a program exploring the chemistry and
applications of cyanoacrylate polymers, we had
occasion to reexamine the 13C-NMR assignments
of the microstructure of poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate)
(PECA, 1).
ples tended toward isotacticity. We employed the
modern NMR techniques3–5 of DEPT (Distortionless Enhancement Polarization Transfer) and 1H13
C HETCOR (Heteronuclear Correlation), which
may not have been available to previous workers
in this area, using two samples of rather different
microstructural distributions. We have concluded
that the literature triad assignments must be reversed.
EXPERIMENTAL
Previous workers1,2 assigned the furthest
downfield resonance (in acetone-d6) of the sidechain methylene carbon atom of PECA to the rr
triad. In addition, they reported that certain samCorrespondence to: D. R. Robello
Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 37, 2219 –2224 (1999)
© 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
CCC 0887-624X/99/132219-06
Ethyl cyanoacrylate was obtained from the Henkel Adhesives Corporation, and was used without
further purification. Diethyl 2,3-dicyanoglutarate
is a by-product from ethyl cyanoacrylate synthesis, and was obtained from Kodak. t-Butyl bromide (Aldrich) was dried over molecular sieves.
Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was dried by distillation
from calcium hydride under nitrogen. Ethanol
was dried by distillation from magnesium under
nitrogen. Methyl iodide, magnesium, and sodium
were obtained from Aldrich.
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) was obtained using three PLgel 10-mm mixed-bed col2219
2220
ROBELLO, ELDRIDGE, AND MICHAELS
umns, calibrated with narrow MW distribution
polystyrene standards. The eluent was dichloromethane/dichloroacetic acid (20/80%) containing 0.01 M tetrabutyl ammonium acetate.6,7
Sample A: Synthesis of Poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate)
by Anionic Polymerization with t-Butyl Magnesium
Bromide Initiator
The initiator was prepared by reacting 0.355 g (14.6
mmol) of magnesium with 2.00 g (14.6 mmol) of
t-butyl bromide in 20 mL of anhydrous ether at
reflux under nitrogen for 2 h. The resulting ethereal
solution was cooled to room temperature, and used
directly. To a stirred solution of 5.50 g (0.044 mol) of
ethyl cyanoacrylate in 40 mL of dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) at Ϫ78°C under nitrogen was added 40
mL of a 0.73 M solution of t-butyl magnesium bromide in ether (above). The resulting mixture was
stirred at Ϫ78°C for 15 min, and then gradually
warmed to 25°C. The reaction mixture was poured
into a solution of 600 mL of methanol containing 1
mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid. The precipitated polymer was filtered and dried in vacuo, producing 4.6 g (84%) of a white, fibrous solid. The
product displayed a monomodal MW distribution by
SEC: Mn ϭ 36,400; Mw ϭ 106,000.
Sample B: Synthesis of Poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate)
by Zwitterionic Polymerization With Triethylamine
Initiator
To a stirred solution of 5.00 g (0.040 mol) of ethyl
cyanoacrylate in 40 mL of dry THF at Ϫ78°C
under nitrogen was added 0.0040 g (0.040 mmol)
of triethylamine. The resulting mixture was
stirred at Ϫ78°C for 15 min, and then gradually
warmed to 25°C overnight. The reaction mixture
was poured into a solution of 600 mL of methanol
containing 1 mL of concentrated hydrochloric
acid. The precipitated polymer was filtered and
dried in vacuo, producing 3.6 g (72%) of a white,
fibrous solid. The product displayed a bimodal
MW distribution: Mn ϭ 18,300; Mw ϭ 131,000
(overall). The lower MW fraction (approximately
40 wt %) was centered near 8000, and the higher
MW fraction (approximately 60 wt %) was centered near 160,000.
Synthesis of Dimeric Model Compound 2
Sodium metal (0.39 g, 0.017 mol) was dissolved in
10 mL of dry ethanol under nitrogen, and a solution of diethyl 2,3-dicyanoglutarate (2.0 g, 0.008
mmol) in 8 mL ethanol was added with stirring.
Methyl iodide (3.57 g, 0.025 mol) was added, the
mixture was heated at reflux for 5 h, and then
cooled. Most of the ethanol was removed at reduced pressure, and the residue was partitioned
between 50 mL each of ether and water. The
organic layer was separated, dried (MgSO4), and
concentrated to provide a tan oil. The oil was
twice fractionally distilled at reduced pressure
(b.p. 120 –130°C/0.05 mm) to provide 0.60 g (28%)
of a 56:44 mixture of 2r and 2m, respectively.
1
H-NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6) ␦ 1.3–1.4 (m, 6H),
1.68 (s, 3H, r), 1.76 (s, 3H, m), 2.52 (AB, Jϭ14.7,
2H, m), 2.54 (s, 2H, r), 4.3– 4.4 (m, 4H). 13C-NMR
(75 MHz, acetone-d6) ␦ r-isomer: 14.01, 26.40,
42.55, 43.59, 63.78, 118.83, 169.05; m-isomer:
14.02, 25.42, 42.17, 42.97, 63.79, 119.33, 168.88.
NMR Experiment Information
The samples for NMR analyses were dissolved in
acetone-d6. Normal 13C and DEPT experiments
were carried out at 75.43 MHz on a Varian VXR300S spectrometer. 1H-13C HETCOR (Heteronuclear Correlation) spectra were obtained at
30°C on a Varian Unity 500 spectrometer with a 5
mm PFG probe. The spectral width in the 1H
domain was 2849 Hz, and in the 13C domain was
18752 Hz. A matrix of 1024 ϫ 512 points with 32
transients per t1 increment were acquired and
zero filled to 2048 ϫ 2048 points. Detection was in
the 1H domain.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Polymer Synthesis
For this study, we prepared two samples by polymerizing ethyl cyanoacrylate monomer, the first
initiated with t-butyl magnesium bromide (sample A) and the second initiated with triethylamine
(sample B). Both polymerizations were carried
out in dry tetrahydrofuran at Ϫ78°C, and the
polymers were precipitated into excess acidified
methanol, filtered, and dried in a vacuum oven.
Polymer Microstructure Studies by NMR
The first difficulty in assigning the microstructure of PECA lies in the overlapping resonances
for the main-chain methylene and methine carbons. This complication can be removed using the
DEPT pulse sequence, for which only carbons
MICROSTRUCTURAL ASSIGNMENTS OF POLY(ETHYL CYANOACRYLATE)
Figure 1. Normal 13C and DEPT NMR of the mainchain methylene and methine region of PECA, sample
A (synthesized using a t-butyl magnesium bromide initiator). The spectra were observed in acetone-d6 at
75.43 MHz.
bearing hydrogens are observed, as illustrated for
sample A in Figure 1.
The second difficulty lies in reconciling the rel-
2221
ative intensities of the signals for the side-chain
methylene (triad tacticity) and the main-chain
methylene (tetrad tacticity), as illustrated in Figure 2 for sample B.
We attempted to make tetrad assignments to
the main-chain methylene 13C peaks with the
help of a 1H-13C HETCOR experiment. In particular, the rrr and mrm tetrads are symmetrical
about the main-chain methylene, and the attached protons exhibit a singlet, while the other
four possibilities (mmm, mmr, rmr, and rrm) are
expected to give rise to two peaks in the 1H spectrum of their attached hydrogens. (Note that the
observed proton linewidths are sufficiently broad
to obscure 1H-1H J couplings. Ordinarily, the less
symmetrical methylenes should have displayed
AB quartets.) As is clearly visible in Figure 3, the
furthest upfield and downfield 13C signals (i.e., ca.
␦ 43.5 and 46.5) are correlated with singlets in the
1
H spectrum; therefore, these peaks must be due
to rrr or mrm tetrads.
It is impossible to reconcile the relative intensities of the 13C signals for the side-chain methylene triads with those for the main-chain methylene tetrads using the literature triad assignments.1,2 In particular, Bovey8 teaches that the
following relationships between triad and tetrad
intensities must hold in all cases:
Figure 2. DEPT spectrum of PECA, sample B (synthesized using a triethylamine
initiator). The spectrum was observed in acetone-d6 at 75.43 MHz. Tacticity assignments for the main-chain methylene carbons follow from the HETCOR data shown in
Figure 3.
2222
ROBELLO, ELDRIDGE, AND MICHAELS
Figure 3. HETCOR of the main-chain methylene region for PECA, sample A (synthesized using a t-butyl
magnesium bromide initiator). The spectra were observed in acetone-d6 in the proton domain at 500 MHz.
The vertical axis displays the 13C chemical shift, and
the horizontal axis displays the 1H chemical shift of the
attached hydrogen atoms. Projections of the 2D spectra
in the 1H and 13C domains are shown above and to the
left, respectively. Note that at this field strength, the
geminal 1H-1H J-couplings are less than the observed
proton linewidths, so that dissymmetric methylenes
display two rather than four peaks in the 1H domain.
rr ϭ rrr ϩ 1 mrr
2
mr ϭ mrr ϩ 2mrm
Neither of these necessary relationships can
follow from the triad assignments from the literature, especially for sample B, as depicted in Figure 2. The peak at ␦ 46.5 is simply too large.
However, if one reverses the literature assignments for the side-chain methylene (i.e., assumes
the furthest downfield 13C signal is due to the mm
triad, and the furthest upfield to the rr triad,
instead of vice-versa), the tetrad assignments can
be made in a completely consistent manner. The
13
C signal at ␦ 46.5 must then be due to rrr, and
that at ␦ 43.5 due to mrm. The remaining mainchain methylene resonances can be tentatively
assigned so that the intensities of all peaks visible
in the DEPT spectra are consistent with Bernoulian statistics (Table I), assuming a probability of
meso placement (Pm) of 0.50 for sample A (initiated with t-butyl magnesium bromide), and 0.30
for sample B (initiated with triethylamine). The
revised triad and new tetrad assignments are
shown in the DEPT spectrum of sample A in
Figure 4.
We consider the assignments of the rmr, rrm,
mmm, and mmr tetrads to be tentative because
we do not have independent substantiating data
for these particular cases. Nevertheless, the tetrad assignments shown in Figure 4 are the only
ones that fit Bernoulian distributions (Table I),
and are also consistent with the observed triad
peak intensities for both samples.
Apparently, the chemical shift difference between the geminal methylene protons in the rrm
stereoisomer is larger than that of the mmr stereoisomer (Fig. 3). One might have expected the
opposite, because, structurally, the rrm tetrad
Table I. Bernoulian Statistics for the Tacticity of the Side-Chain and Methylene
Tacticity
Assignmentsa
Triad
mm
mr
rr
Tetrad
rrr
rmr ϩ rrm
mmm ϩ mmr
mrm
a
13
Sample A
P m ϭ 0.50 c
Predicted
␦ 65.1
␦ 64.7
␦ 64.5
␦ 46.5
␦ 45.4
␦ 44.3
␦ 43.5
C Chemical
Shiftb
13
C Signals for PECA
Sample A Foundd
Sample B
P m ϭ 0.30 c
Predicted
Sample B Foundd
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.26
0.46
0.28
0.09
0.42
0.49
0.11
0.41
0.48
0.13
0.38
0.38
0.13
0.16
0.35
0.34
0.14
0.34
0.44
0.16
0.06
0.35
0.41
0.18
0.06
Assignments are from this work. The assignments of tetrads rmr, rrm, mmm, and mmr are tentative.
In acetone-d6.
P m indicates probability of a meso placement.
d
Data are taken from the DEPT spectra of Figures 2 and 4.
b
c
MICROSTRUCTURAL ASSIGNMENTS OF POLY(ETHYL CYANOACRYLATE)
2223
Figure 4. DEPT spectrum of PECA, sample A (synthesized using a t-butyl magnesium bromide initiator). The spectrum was observed in acetone-d6 at 75.43 MHz.
Tacticity assignments are from this work.
seems to be more symmetrical than the mmr tetrad from the point of view of the central methylene. Indeed, this expected behavior has been observed for the closely related polymer, polymethacrylonitrile.9
placement (according to the assignments made
herein). This observation may be related to the
changes in the molecular weight observed for solutions of poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) in the presence of added base, as reported by Ryan and McCann.10 Details of our studies in this area will be
reported in a forthcoming publication.
Model Compound Studies
However, in the case of PECA, the presence of
the highly polar and magnetically anisotropic
cyano group presumably perturbs the chemical
shifts of the methylene protons of one or both of
these stereoisomers in the preferred local chain
confirmation to give rise to the observed shifts.
The differences in tacticity between the two
PECA samples may be attributable to the different counterions present during chain growth. Presumably, the counterion influences the chain conformation at the growing end, and may also affect
the accessibility of incoming monomer. In addition, the syndiotactic content of sample B may
have been enhanced by the relatively long time
that the material was held in solution during
synthesis. We have found that the distribution of
stereoisomers in PECA equilibrates spontaneously in solution, tending toward syndiotactic
To substantiate our assignments, we also synthesized a model compound 2 (which contains two
repeat units of polymer 1) by double alkylation of
diethyl 2,3-dicyanoglutarate (3) with methyl iodide. Compound 2 was isolated as a 56:44 (r:m)
mixture of diastereomers.
1
H-13C HETCOR analysis was used to make
assignments of the carbon resonances of 2, and
the results corroborate the assignments for polymer 1 as proposed in this study. For example, the
furthest downfield signal for the side-chain methylene of polymer 1 is assigned to the mm triad,
and the furthest downfield peak for the same
2224
ROBELLO, ELDRIDGE, AND MICHAELS
carbon in the model compound 2 is due to the m
diastereomer. Similarly, the furthest downfield
main-chain methylene signal in the polymer 1 is
assigned to the rrr tetrad, and the corresponding
peak for the model compound 2 is due to the r
diastereomer.
CONCLUSIONS
With these new assignments, it can be seen that
poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate) initiated by an amine
tends toward syndiotacticity, not isotacticity, as
previously reported1,2 (cf. Fig. 2). This conclusion
is consistent with the recognized tendency of
analogous polymethacrylates to adopt syndiotactic placements. The sample of poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate) made with t-butyl magnesium bromide
initiator displays a nearly ideal, equal distribution of stereoisomers, in contrast to methyl
methacrylate, which is reported to be polymerized
by the same initiator (albeit in a nonpolar solvent,
toluene) to produce highly isotactic PMMA.
We are currently examining stereochemical
changes that occur when poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate) is held for periods of time in solution. A
complete report will be published in due course.
We wish to thank Prof. Almeria Natansohn from
Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, for reviewing the stereochemical assignments.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. Fawcett, A. J.; Guthrie, J.; Otterburn, M. S.; Szeto,
D. Y. S. J Polym Sci Polym Lett Ed 1988, 26, 459.
2. Lavrukhin, B. D.; Kandror, I. I.; Guseva, T. I.;
Senchenya, N. G.; Lopatina, I. V.; Mager, K. A.;
Gololobov, Y. G. Vysokomol Soedin Ser B 1990, 32,
55.
3. Cheng, H. N.; Lee, G. H. Trends Anal Chem 1990,
9, 285.
4. Cheng, H. N. In Modern Methods of Polymer Characterization; Barth, H. G.; Mays, J. W., eds.; Wiley:
New York, 1991, p. 409.
5. Bovey, F. A. Polym Eng Sci 1986, 26, 1419.
6. Mourey, T. H.; Bryan, T. G. J Chromatogr A 1994,
679, 201.
7. Mourey, T. H.; Bryan, T. G.; Greener, J. J Chromatogr A 1993, 657, 377.
8. Bovey, F. A. Chain Structure and Conformation of
Macromolecules; Academic Press: New York, 1982.
9. Dong, L.; Hill, D. J. T.; O’Donnell, J. H.; Whittaker,
A. K. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 1830.
10. Ryan, B.; McCann, G. Makromol Chem Rapid Commun 1996, 17, 217.
Coments go here:
- Log in to post comments