A Xanthate-Derived Photoinitiator that Recognizes and Controls the Free Radical Polymerization Pathways of Methyl Methacrylate and Styrene

A Xanthate-Derived Photoinitiator that Recognizes and Controls the Free Radical Polymerization Pathways of Methyl Methacrylate and Styrene

Document
Talk
 
 
 
 
Year: 
Abstract: 

A xanthate derived photoinitiator, S-methacryloyl O-ethyl xanthate (MAX) bearing an electron-deficient polymerizable double bond has been found to be capable of distinguishing MMA and styrene, thereby dictating their polymerization pathways in distinctly different and controlled fashion. The structure, molecular weight, and the polydispersity of each polymer have been determined by spectral analysis and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Photopolymerization of MMA using MAX under 350-nm irradiation led to the formation of narrow dispersed (Mw/Mn < 1.5) linear “macroinitiators” with methacryloyl and thiocarbonyl thiyl end functional groups by a controlled free radical mechanism where the molecular weights remained nearly the same, independent of irradiation time. The presence of the thiocarbonyl thiyl group was further confirmed by the block copolymerization of methyl acrylate using the macroinitiator. On the other hand, photopolymerization of styrene with MAX showed considerable increase in molecular weights and polydispersities with irradiation time, as in the case of a pseudo-“living” free radical polymerization. Nevertheless, in the present case, the molecular weight increase and the broad polydispersity of polystyrene are explained on the basis of the branching of the polymer chain, which is supported by IR and NMR spectral analysis. This unusual behavior of MAX is attributed to its “tricky” approach toward MMA and styrene, making use of the electron availability around their double bonds. MAX behaves only as a photoinitiator toward the electron-deficient MMA, whereas it plays the dual role of a photoinitiator as well as a co-monomer toward electron-rich styrene due to a weak donor−acceptor interaction, leading to the initial formation of a macro-photoinitiator and the subsequent formation of branched and cross-linked polymers. Interestingly, S-benzoyl O-ethyl xanthate, an analogous photoinitiator without a polymerizable double bond, did not show any differences in the polymerization of MMA and styrene, thereby emphasizing the role of the methacryloyl moiety of MAX in controlling their polymerization pathways.

DOI: 
10.1021/ja983239c
Type of document: 
Language: 
W 7 1. 6606 J. Am. Chem. Soc.. Vol. 121, N0. 28, 1999 the case of MMA, MAX acts as a photoinitiator, leading to linear polymers with controlled molecular weights and poly- dispersities. On the other hand, MAX plays the dual role of a photoinitiator and a co~monomer during the photopolymerization of styrene, leading to branched and cross-linked polymers. The observed twist in the photopolymerization of styrene from that of MMA is explained on the basis of a weak donor-acceptor interaction between styrene and MAX. This could be the first report of a smart photoinitiator that can sense the electron availability around the rnonomer’s double bond, thereby facili- tating the formation of different macromolecular architectures. We believe that the concept of ‘smart’ photoinitiators will add a new dimension to the field of free radical mediated controlled synthesis of novel macromolecular materials such as hyper- branched and dendrigraft polymers. Experimental Section Infrared (IR) and electronic spectra were recorded on a Perkin—Elmer model 880 and Shimadzu 2100 A spectrophotometers, respectively. Electronic spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu 2100 A spectropho- tometer. Mass spectra were recorded on a Hew1ett~Packard mass spectrometer model 5791, attached to 5890 series 11 gas chromatography setup, attached with an OV 101 (25 m long and 0.2 mm i.d.) or with MP-FFAP (25 m long and 0.2 mm id) capillary column, and a FID detector. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Joel EX 90 or a Brucker DPX 300 spectrometer using CDCI3 as the solvent and tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. Size—exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed on a Shimadzu LC—6A system equipped with three serially connected Shimpac columns and a refractive index detector. Calibration was performed with polystyrene standards. THF was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL min” at 28 °C. Methyl methacrylate (MMA), methyl acrylate (MA), and styrene (St) were purified by distillation under reduced pressure after washing with 5% aqueous N aOH solution. All solvents were dried and distilled before use. Preparation of S-Methacryloyl 0-Ethyl Xanthate (MAX). To a stirred suspension of potassium 0—ethyl xanthate (16.0 g, 0.1 mol) in dichloromethane (100 IILL), maintained at 0 °C, was gradually added a solution of methacryloyl chloride (10.4 g, 0.1 mol) in dichloromethane (100 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional period of l h and allowed to warm gradually to room temperature. The reaction mixture was washed several times with water, and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Removal of the solvent under reduced pressure gave 17.0 g (90%) of MAX as a yellow liquid. IR Ajayaghosh and Francis 1/ma, (neat) 1720, 1640, 1240, 1050 cm”; UV firm, (CHC13), 280 (E, 10400), 395 (90) nm; 1H NMR (CDCI3. 90 MHz) 5 5.9-6.5 (2 H, in, CH2), 4.7 (2 H, q, OCHz), 2.0 (3 H, s, CH3), 1.45 (3 H, t, CH3); ‘3C NMR (CDCI3, 22.4 MHZ) 6 204, 186, 144, 126, 71, 18, 14. Mass spectrum m/z 191 [M1 + 1], 147, 172, 155, 103, 87, 73, 69. Photopolymerization of MMA Using MAX. A stock solution of MMA in dry benzene (5 M) containing MAX (5 X 10’3 M) was prepared, and 10 mL each of this solution was transferred into different Pyrex glass tubes (1.4 cm diameter and 15 cm long). They were stoppered with rubber septa and purged with argon for 15 min followed by irradiation in a Rayonet photochemical reactor (RPR) containing eight 350-nrn fluorescent lamps for known periods of time. After irradiation, the contents were poured into excess methanol, and the precipitated polymers were collected by filtration and washed with methanol. Purification of the polymers was achieved by reprecipitation from their chloroform solutions by methanol. After several reprecipi— rations, the polymers were filtered and dried in a vacuum oven (50 °C) for 24 h. IR Vmax (neat) 1721, 1452, 1249, 1148, 1043 and 993 cm“; 1H NMR (CDCI3, 300 MHZ) 6 6.2 (m, CH2=C), 4.65 (s (broad), OCH2), 3.6 (s, OCH3), 1.8-0.8 (m, aliphatic). Photoinduced Block Copolymerization of Methyl Acrylate (MA) with Macroinitiator 7. The macroinitiator 7 (50 mg) with a molecular weight of 1.6 X 10“ g/mol was dissolved in MA (4 M in benzene) (10 mL) and placed in a quartz reaction vial, which was closed with a rubber septum. The polymerization mixture was purged with dry argon for 15 min and irradiated in an RPR with eight 300—nm fluorescent lamps. After 90 min, the reaction mixture was diluted with chloroform, and the contents were precipitated with methanol. The precipitated polymer was purified by redissolving in THF and reprecipitating from hexane. Yield, 25%. Mn = 2.1 X 105, MW/Mn = 1.2. Photopolymerization of Styrene with MAX. A solution of styrene (4.5 M) and MAX (4.5 X 10‘1 M) in dry benzene (10 rnL) was taken in a Pyrex glass tube and purged with argon for 15 min. The solution was irradiated for 7 h as described in the case of the polymerization of MMA. Yield 29%. IR vmax (neat) 1700, 1600, 1492, 1451, 1242, 1040, 757, 709, and 541 crn"1; ‘H NMR (CDCI3, 300 MHZ) 6 7.1-6.3 (m, aromatic), 4.5 (m, OCH2), 2.1-1.2 (m, aliphatic); M,, = 2.5 X 104, MW/Mn = 1.6. Acknowledgment. We thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India and the Regional Research Laboratory, Trivandrum for financial support. This paper is dedicated to Professor M. V. George on the occasion of his 70th birthday. JA983239C
Coments go here: