Synthesis and bioevaluation of alkyl
2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates as potential soft tissue
adhesives
H. Jaffe,* C. W R. Wade, A. F. Hegyeli,+ R. Rice, and J. Hodge
.
U. S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratoy,Fort Detrick,
Frederick, Maryland 21701
A series of alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolate
tissue adhesives were synthesized and
characterized by NMR. Physical properties
and bond strengths are presented. Within
the series, bond strength decreased with
increasing molecular weight. Corresponding polymers were evaluated by in vitro
and in vivo techniques for biocompatibility.
In general, in vitro biocompatibility increased with molecular weight. Based on
in vitro and in vivo results, the isobutyl
and isoamyl derivatives gave polymers that
were most biocompatible, however, the entire series was found to be less reactive than
poly(methyl2-cyanoacrylate) and only the
isopropyl derivative polymers more reactive than poly(isobuty1 2-cyanoacrylate).
Approximately one-third of the isobutyl
polymer biodegraded in vivo after 6 weeks.
INTRODUCTION
The rapidly polymerizing alkyl2-cyanoacrylates have been used as tissue
adhesives and hemostatic agents because of their ability to adhere to moist
tissue.' In the homologous series of poly(alky1 2-cyanoacrylates) the lower
alkyl homologues, e.g., methyl, exhibit the most rapid rate of biodegradation
but are also the most toxic to tissue. The higher alkyl homologues, e.g.,
isobutyl and isoamyl, which exhibit low tissue toxicity are most frequently
used as tissue adhesives, hemostatic agents and antiblister agents, and
osseous adhesives. In addition they exhibit good wetting and spreading
characteristics on proteinaceous tissue. However, a serious shortcoming
of the higher alkyl homologues are their long lifetimes in tissue caused by
their low rates of
In an effort to find an "ideal" tissue adhesive, our laboratory undertook the
synthesis of 2-cyanoacrylate derivatives containing easily hydrolyzable nontoxic groups, such as, glycolate esters and glycerol k e t a l ~ , ~ - ~ could
which
provide a "handle" on the resulting polymer for rapid biodegradation. We
*Presentaddress: USDA, ARS, AEQI, Livestock Insects Laboratory, Rm. 120, Bldg. 307,
BARC-East, Beltsville, MD 20705.
'Deceased.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 20, 205-212 (1986)
CCC 0021-9304/86/020205-08$04.00
01986 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
206
JAFFE ET AL.
now report the synthesis and preliminary bioevaluation of this new series of
potential tissue adhesives, the alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates:
CH2=C
FN
‘C02CHZCO2R
R = Me,Et,i - Pr,i - Bu,i - Am
The incorporation of the glycolyl ester group in these molecules provides
an additional site for hydrolytic attack and thus should increase the biodegradability of these compounds. The aliphatic alcohols and glycolic acid
released upon hydrolysis are expected to be of relatively low tissue toxicity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Starting materials
Glycolate esters were purchased (Fisher Scientific, Silver Springs, MD) or
synthesized from glycolic acid and the appropriate alcohol. All other reagents were of the highest purity commercially available. Solvents were ACS
reagent grade used without further purification.
Alkyl 2-cyanoacetyl glycolates
The alkyl2-cyanoacetyl glycolates were prepared by Fisher esterification of
the glycolate esters and cyanoacetic acid in benzene or by use of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) in the THF (see Fig. 1).The resulting alkyl
DDC Esterification
HOCHZCOOR + NCCH,COOH=
DCC
NCCHzCOOCH2COOR
Alkyl 2-Cyanoacetyl Glycolates
Knoevenagel Reaction
HCHO
N C C H 2 C 0 0 C H 2 C 0 0 ~ - - + CH2= C
Base
‘TOOCH~COOR
Alkyl 2-Cyanoacryloyl Glycolates
CHz=C
FN
‘COOCH2COOR
R= Me, Et, i-Pr, i-Bu, i-Am
&CHzOOCHZCOOR
Poly(Alky1 2-Cyanoacryloyl Glycolates)
Figure 1. Synthesis of alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolate monomers and
polymers.
ALKYL 2-CYANOACRYLOYL GLYCOLATES
207
2-cyanoacetyl glycolates were purified by fractional distillation. Purity of the
fractions was checked by NMR and glpc on 3% OV1. The synthesis of alkyl
2-cyanoacetyl glycolates by DCC esterification is illustrated by the following
example for isopropyl2-cyanoacetyl glycolate.
To a stirred mixture of 94.50 g (0.800 mol) isopropyl glycolate and 68.05 g
(0.800 mol) cyanoacetic acid in 1000 mL THF maintained at 5-10"C, was
added dropwise a solution of 165.06 g (0.800 mol) dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
in 500 mL THE The resulting thick suspension was allowed to warm up to
room temperature, filtered to remove the dicyclohexylurea, and evaporated
to give an oil. After cooling overnight, additional urea was filtered off to give
crude isopropyl 2-cyanoacetyl glycolate. Fractional distillations at reduced
pressure through a short Vigreux column gave (123.4 g, 84%)pure isopropyl
2-cyanoacetyl glycolate, b.p. 93"C/0.10 mm Hg, with infrared and NMR
spectra consistent with the proposed structure. Purity was checked by glpc
(3% OVl).
Alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates
When the pure alkyl cyanoacetyl glycolates were allowed to react with
paraformaldehyde under Knoevenagel reaction conditions, the theoretical
amount of water was produced in each case. The resulting oligomers were
cracked under SO2 to give alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates (Fig. 1). Short
path distillation at reduced pressure gave pure materials. Structural confirmation was done by NMR on a model T60A (Varian Associates, Palo Alto,
CA) instrument. Physical and NMR data are presented in Table I. The synthesis of alkyl2-cyanoacryloylglycolates is illustrated by the following example for isopropyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolate.
TABLE I
Physical and NMR Data of Alkyl 2-Cyanoacryloyl Glycolates
Alkyl group Boiling point ("C)
Methyl
Ethyl
Isopropyl
Isobutyl
Isoamyl
Nh4R Data"
(CDC13)6 3.85 (s,3, CH3), 4.90 (s, 2, CHzCO),
6.97 (s, 1, olefinic H) and 7.32 (s, 1, olefinic H)
118-24/1.35 mm (CDC13)S 1.30 (t, 3, CH3), 4.31 (q, 2, CUZCH3)r
4.88 (s,2, CHzCO), 6.92 (s, 1, olefinic H) and
7.30 (s, 1,olefinic H)
108-15/0.70 mm (CCL)6 1.27 (d, 6, CH(CFJ3k 4.80 (s, 2, CHzCO),
6.91 (s, 1,olefinic H) and
5.14 (m, 1, CFJ(CH3)z),
7.25 (s, 1, olefinic H)
126/0.60 mm
(CDC13)S .95 (d, 6, CH(CFJ3),), 1.98 (m, 1, CH(CH,),),
4.03 (d, 2, CFJzCH(CH3)2),4.90 (s,2, CHZCO),
6.88 (s, 1,olefinic H), and 7.28 (s, 1,olefinic H)
110-16/0.25 mm (CDC13)S .93 (d, 6, CH(CI-J3)2), 1.31-2.07 (m, 3, CHXH),
4.30 (t, 2, OCHZCHz), 4.90 (s, 2, CHzCO),
6.90 (s, 1,olefinic H) and 7.30 (s, 1,olefinic H)
108-12/1.0 mm
"In ppm from TMS.
208
JAFFE ET AL.
To a refluxing solution of 37.04 g (0.200 mol) isopropyl2-cyanoacetyl glycolate and three drops of piperidene in 75 mL benzene, was added 6.00 g
(0.200 mol) of paraformaldehyde portionwise over a period of several hours.
After 30 h of reflux, 3.6 mL water had been removed by azeotropic distillation into a Dean-Stark trap. Benzene (60 mL) was distilled off and 20 mL
tricresyl phosphate, 3.00 g P205and 0.30 g pyrogallol added to the pot. The
Dean-Stark trap was replaced with an oven-dried, acid-washed short path
distillation apparatus with SOn bleed. The polymeric pot materials were
cracked under SO2 into a chilled receiver containing a small amount of
pyrogallol and P205 at 135°C at 1-2 mm Hg. The crude monomer (16.82 g,
43%) was fractionally distilled under SO2 through an oven-dried, acidwashed short path apparatus, b.p. 108-15"/0.70 mm Hg. Prior to redistillation, 10 mL tricresyl phosphate, 1.50 g P2O5 and 0.15 g pyrogallol were
added to the crude monomer. The purity of the fractions and structure were
determined by NMR. The monomer was stored in the cold over a trace of
p-methoxyphenol.
Poly (alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates)
Poly (alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates) were prepared from the corresponding monomers by dropwise addition of 10.00 g of monomer to a
400 mL vigorously stirred pH 7.00 buffer. The resulting precipitate was
stirred vigorously with water in a blender, triturated with distilled-in-glass
hexane and dried in vucuo to give polymer as a fine white powder.
Poly(isobuty1 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolate-2-14C)
Isobutyl2-cyanoacetyl glycolate-2-14Cwas prepared as described above by
DCC esterification of 33.04 g isobutyl glycolate (0.250 mol),
0.0454 g14C-cyanoaceticacid (0.0227 mCi/mg) and 21.27 g cyanoacetic acid
(0.250 mol) in THF. The specific activity of the resulting purified product was
determined by liquid scintillation methods to be 27,846 DPM/mg.
Isobutyl 2-~yanoacryloyl-2-'~C
glycolate monomer and its corresponding
polymer were prepared from isobutyl 2-cyanoacetyl-2-14Cglycolate as described above. The 14C-polymerhad a specific activity of 23,100 DPM/mg.
Bond strengths of the monomers
Bond strengths of the monomers on Aluminum test blocks were determined by ASTM method 0897-49 and are shown in Table 11. Ten determinations were made on completely polymerized samples kept for more
than 22 h. The value listed in the average of two to four samples.
ALKYL 2-CYANOACRYLOYL GLYCOLATES
209
TABLE I1
Bond Strength of Alkyl 2-Cyanoacryloyl Glycolates
Alkyl group
Mean bond strength (psi)
Methyl
Ethyl
Isopropyl
Isobutyl
Isoamyl
2375
1515
616"
1445
1238
"Samples had not completely polymerized after 119 hrs.
In vitro and v i m biocompatibility studies
The alkyl 2-cyanoacryloyl glycolate polymers were screened by our previously described methods for in vitro and in vivo bioc~mpatibility.~~~
In vivo biodegradation
Male rats (Sprague-Dawley derivation), weighing from 200 to 275 g
were used as test animals. Approximately 100 mg of labeled isobutyl
2-cyanoacryloyl glycolate was compressed,into pellets. The pellets were cut
in half and each of the halves accurately weighed and implanted into the
rats essentially as described previously.8The incisions were closed and the
iiu.
rats were given food and water ad l b t m
Two rats each were killed at 2, 4 and 6 weeks. The implants were excised
,
and transferred quantitatively to 10 mL flasks. Tissue dissecting solution
(hyamine hydroxide) was added and the mixture was agitated at 60°C until
dissolution was complete. The solution, diluted to exactly 10 mL, was used
for assay for radioactivity.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The synthetic routes for the preparation of the alkyl2-cyanoacryloyl glycolates and their polymers are shown in Figure 1. The use of DCC in the
esterification step resulted in high yields and simplified purification. Physical
and NMR data for these new compounds are listed in Table I. In all cases,
chemical shifts were as expected.
Bond strengths are shown in Table I1 and are comparable to the simple
alkyl2-cyanoa~rylates.'~ expected the bond strength of the methyl derivaAs
tive was highest and declined throughout the series with increasing molecular weight. All derivatives had bond strength in excess of that needed for
tissue adhesives. The anomolous result for the isopropyl derivative is due to
incomplete polymerization of the sample probably caused by the presence of
excess inhibitor and/or lack of moisture on the test plates.
JAFFE ET AL.
210
TABLE XI1
In Vitro and In Vim Toxicity of the Poly(Alkyl2-Cyanoacryloyl Glycolates)
and Poly(Alky1 2-Cyanoacrylate)
In vivo class
Alkyl group
In vitro class
7 days
28 days
Me
Et
i -Pr
i-Bu
i-Am
Me”
i-Bu”
111
I1
I
I1
I
I
I1
I
I11
I
I1
11
1
11
1
11
1
I1
I1
I1
11
1
I1
I1
I1
Note: I = in vitro, little or no growth inhibition, in vivo, slight or no tissue reaction;
I1 = in vitro, moderate growth inhibition, in vivo, moderate tissue reaction; 1 1 = in vitro,
1
extensive growth inhibition, in vivo - severe tissue reaction.
”Alkyl 2-Cyanoacrylates from ref. 8-9.
Results of the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility studies of the polymers
are shown in Table 111. Also shown are data on the poly(methy1and isobutyl
2-cyanoacrylate) for comparison. At the time of kill all of the rats appeared
to be healthy and showed no obvious signs of illness. There was no gross
evidence of inflammation at the site of implantation and the implants were
cleanly and easily removed from the muscle tissue. Recovery of the remaining implant appeared to be total, indicating that no losses occurred because
of the handling and removal of the implant.
As seen in Table 111, in vitro toxicity of the alkyl2-cyanoacryloyl polymers
appears to generally decrease with increasing molecular weight and with the
expected decreasing rate of biodegradation. Based on the in vitro and in vivo
results, the isobutyl and isoamyl derivatives are the most biocompatible,
however, the entire series as a group was found to be less reactive than
poly(methyl2-cyanoacrylate) and all except the isopropyl less reactive than
poly(isobuty12-cyanoacrylate). The biocompatibility screening of the series
did not eliminate any of the compounds from further evalution, except,
perhaps the isopropyl derivative because it was most reactive in vivo and in
the toxic class in vitro.
The methyl derivative, even though in the in vitro toxic class, would be a
good candidate for further study because of its superior bond strength,
predicted rapid biodegradation rate and similar tissue reaction to the widely
used isobutyl 2-cyanoacrylate. Some evidence for an initial rapid biodegradation of the methyl derivative can be seen by its toxic classification in
vitro and a decline of its in vivo toxicity classification from 7 days (group 11)
to 28 days (group I). A similar effect was observed*,9with the rapidly biodegradable methyl 2-cyanoacrylate.
Our radiobiodegradation experiment indicated that approximately twothirds of the isobutyl derivative remained after 6 weeks which indicates a
ALKYL 2-CYANOACRYLOYL GLYCOLATES
211
somewhat more rapid biodegradation rate than the alkyl 2-cyanoacrylate
series. Based on this limited data it would be premature to draw extensive
correlation between degradation rates and toxicity data, though it does seem
likely that the lower expected degradation rates of isoamyl and isobutyl
compounds compared to the other derivatives can be correlated with their
greater biocompatibility. The radiobiodegradation data presented is intended
to be preliminary, but in light of past difficulties in attempting to bring the
cyanoacrylate tissue into clinical use in the United States, further work on
these compounds, including a complete radiobiology absorption study, is
clearly indicated.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that incorporation of the alkyl
glycolyl ester in place of an alkyl group does not significantly alter bonding
properties of the adhesives. All of the adhesives had bonding strength that
is greater than required to effectively hold tissue together. The new materials
are biodegradable, relatively non toxic and worthy of further long-term study
as tissue adhesives.
In conducting the research described in this report, the investigators adhered to the
"Guide for Laboratory Animal Facilities and Care" as promulgated by the Committee on
the Guide for Laboratory Animal Facilities and Care of the Institute of Laboratory Animal
Resources, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. The opinions or
assertations contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be
construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the
Department of Defense.
This article is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Andrew F. Hegyeli.
References
1 F. Leonard, R. K. Kulkarni, J. Nelson, and G. Brandes, "Tissue adhe.
sives and hemostasis-inducing compounds: The alkyl cyanoacrylates,"
J. Biomed. Muter. Res., 1, 3-9 (1967).
2. T. Matsumoto, K. C. Pani, R. M. Hardaway, and F. Leonard, "N-alkyl
a-cyanoacrylate monomers in surgery, Arch. Surg., 94, 153-156 (1967).
3. T. Matsumoto, K. C. Pani, R. M. Hardaway, and F. Leonard, "N-aklyl
alpha cyanoacrylate monomers as a tissue adhesive in surgery of internal
organs," Military Med., 132, 515-521 (1967).
4. F. Leonard, "The N-aklylalphacyanoacrylate tissue adhesives," Ann.
N. Y. Acud. Sci., 146, 203-213 (1968).
5. T. Matsumoto, R. M. Hardaway, K. C. Pani, and P. M. Margetis, "Aron
alpha A "Sankyo," Japanese tissue adhesive, in surgery of internal organs,'' Am. Surg., 34, 263-267 (1968).
6. M. C. Harper and M. Ralston, "Isobutyl 2-cyanoacrylate as a osseous
adhesive in the repair of osteochondral fractures," J. Biorned. Muter. Res.,
17, 167-177 (1983).
7. H. Jaffe, C. W. R. Wade, A. F. Hegyeli, R. Rice, and J. Hodge, "Synthesis and bioevaluation of a rapidly biodegradable tissue adhesive:
1,2-isopropylidene glyceryl 2-cyanoacrylate," submitted.
8. S. J. Gourlay, R. M. Rice, A. F. Hegyeli, C. W. R. Wade, J. G. Dillon, H.
Jaffe, and R. K. Kulkarni, "Biocompatibility testing of polymers: In vivo
implantation studies," J. Biorned. Muter. Res., 12, 219-232 (1978).
212
JAFFE ET AL.
9. R. M. Rice, A. F. Hegyeli, S. J. Gourlay, C. W. R. Wade, J. G. Dillion, H.
Jaffe, and R. K. Kulkarni, ”Biocompatibility testing of polymers: In vitro
studies with in vivo correlation,” J. Biomed. Muter. Res., l2,43-54 (1978).
10. F. Leonard, J. W. Hodge, Jr., S. Houston, and D.K. Ousterbout,
“a-Cyanoacrylate adhesive bond strengths with proteinaceous and nonproteinaceous substrates,” J. Biomed. Muter. Res., 2, 173-178 (1968).
Received June 3, 1985
Accepted August 12, 1985