Article
pubs.acs.org/Macromolecules
Fluorescent Cyanoacrylate Monomers and Polymers for Fingermark
Development
Alfonso Bentolila,† Jalindar Totre,‡ Ilana Zozulia,‡ Michal Levin-Elad,† and Abraham J. Domb*,†,‡
†
Latent Fingerprint Laboratory, Division of Identification and Forensic Science, Israel Police, Jerusalem, Israel
Institute of Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, Hebrew
University of Jerusalem, Jersalem, Israel
‡
ABSTRACT: Cyanoacrylate esters with fluorescent side groups were
synthesized and tested as agents for latent fingerprint development. Reactive
monomers with benzyl, anthracyl, naphthyl, fluorenyl, propagyl, and
cyanomethyl side groups were synthesized using the formation of an ethyl
cyanoacrylate, anthracene adduct, followed by hydrolysis of the ethyl ester to
the acid and esterification with a desired alcohol, and finally release of the
monomer by retro-Diels−Alder with maleic anhydride. Monomers were
prepared in high yield and purity as determined by spectral analysis. Attempts
to synthesize these monomers from poly(ethyl cyanoacrylate) by transesterification and depolymerization resulted in low yields and low purity. The
synthesized fluorescent monomers were found to be effective for latent
fingerprint development in solution forming clear fluorescent fingerprint
images suitable for forensic fingerprint comparison. These monomers can
complement the current use of the commonly used nonfluorescent ethyl
cyanoacrylate monomers for fingerprint development.
fingerprints are only slightly visible. One has to use a visible or
fluorescent dye to enhance visibility of the developed
fingerprints. An additional problem is that overdeposition of
cyanoacrylate polymerization on a latent fingerprint may cover
the print precluding forensic comparison. In addition, the
application of a dye as a second step is time-consuming and not
cost-effective in field development of prints. Many experiments
have been conducted in which physical mixtures of fluorescent
dyes and cyanoacrylate monomers were fumed together and
deposited onto fingerprint.8,9 The sublimated state is supposed
to react with one or more of the components of the residue of a
latent fingerprintto form a discernible fluorescent image of the
mark. Despite these efforts, mixing large amounts of fluorescent
dyes into the cyanoacrylate monomer resulted in poor
fluorescence prints without practical utility. To the best of
the authors’ knowledge, no cyanoacrylate monomers other than
alkyl derivatives have been reported for fingermark applications,
despite Rao’s work.10 Furthermore, fluorescent cyanoacrylate
monomers have not been reported in the scientific literature.
In an effort to synthesize new cyanoacrylates that would
contain colored, fluorescent, or UV absorbing groups, the
authors successfully synthesized cyanoacrylate esters that show
the desired properties. Several cyanoacrylate esters with
fluorescent moiety were synthesized and tested for fingermark
development. The use of cyanoacrylates in solution was
1. INTRODUCTION
Alkyl cyanoacrylates are solvent free liquids that polymerize and
cure rapidly in the presence of nucleophiles (including moisture
from the air) to form adhesive, glue, and films.1,2 These alkyl
cyanoacrylates have long been used for bonding nonporous
materials in biomedical fields such as tissue adhesives, for drug
delivery, in the automobile and electronics industries, and in
forensic laboratories for fingerprint development.3,4 Earlier
generations of cyanoacrylates (methyl, ethyl) had significant
performance limitations such as poor thermal stability, peel
strength, and high tissue reaction. Continued research on
cyanoacrylates resulted in the development of new alkyl
cyanoacrylates to overcome these limitations. Cyanoacrylate
butyl and octyl esters have been found to be biodegradable and
biocompatible.5−7 Cyanoacrylate ethyl ester has been used as
an adhesive for nonmedical applications by applying the
monomer, which is rapidly polymerized into a strong adhesive
polymer. This monomer, commonly known as “Superglue”, has
been used extensively as a fingerprint developer; latent
fingerprints on exhibits are discovered when applying “Superglue” vapors in a closed chamber. Fingerprint components
polymerize the monomer so that a white print is visualized. Its
success as a method of choice lies in the fact that it may be
applied to a large variety of surfaces such as plastics, metal, and
glass. Cyanoacrylates are nonselective in their compound target
and are therefore able to develop fingerprint residue with both
eccrine and sebaceous.3−5 This method can be used on older as
well as recent fingerprints. One of the limitations of its use is
that due to its white color formation, sometimes the developed
© 2013 American Chemical Society
Received: April 23, 2013
Revised: June 3, 2013
Published: June 17, 2013
4822
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma400837h | Macromolecules 2013, 46, 4822−4828
Macromolecules
Article
suggested by Mr. Itoh, a forensic technician in Japan.11 With
this in mind, the authors applied the newly synthesized
cyanoacrylates in solution.
Esters of Cyanoacrylic Acid−Anthracene Adduct (5). Cyanoacrylic
acid anthracene adduct (1.5 g, 5.44 mmol) was dissolved in
dichloromethane (30 mL) in a dry round-bottom flask under nitrogen
atmosphere. The desired alcohol (5.49 mmol) and 2 mg of
dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as a catalyst were added. The
solution was cooled to 0 °C, and a solution of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (1.132g, 5.49 mol) in dichloromethane (30 mL) was
added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h TLC (20%
ethyl acetate/hexane + 0.1% acetic acid); monitoring shows
completion of the reaction (consumption of starting acid adduct).
The solution was filtered, washed with dichloromethane (30 mL). The
solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield a white solid,
which was crystallized from diethyl ether to obtain pure esters
(∼90%).
Cyanoacrylate Esters (7). A clean, dry 100 mL round bottomed
flask under nitrogen atmosphere was charged with cyanoacrylate
ester−anthracene adduct (51 mmol), maleic anhydride (1.5 g, 153
mmol), dry xylene (50 mL), hydroquinone (15 mg), and phosphorus
pentoxide (350 mg). The mixture was refluxed for 36 h, cooled to 10
°C, and filtered. The filtration cake was washed with diethyl ether and
dried to yield 1.39g maleic anhydride anthracene adduct (98%).
Solvents were evaporated from the mother liquor to leave syrup
primarily containing the desired cyanoacrylate esters. The residue was
crystallized from ether to afford a pure substance.
Synthesis of Cyanoacrylate Benzyl Ester−Anthracene Adduct
(5a). Esterification of the cyanoacrylic acid−anthracene adduct (4)
with benzyl alcohol by DCC coupling in dichloromethane (DCM)
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
2.1. Materials. Reagents and deuterated solvents for NMR
spectrography were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Israel (Rehovot,
Israel). The ethyl cyanoacrylate (ECA) used was manufactured by
Loctite and commercialized as Hard Evidence by Lightning Co.
(Jacksonville, FL). By-40 was purchased from W.S. Simpson & Co.
(London, U.K.). All reagents and compounds used for synthesis were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Rehovot, Israel). Analytical grade
solvents were bought from Biolab (Jerusalem, Israel). Silica gel for thin
layer chromatography (TLC) and liquid chromatography (LC) was
purchased from Merck (Damstart, Germany). NMR was recorded on a
Varian instrument at 300 MHz for proton and 74 MHz for 13C spectra.
Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm. FT-IR was recorded on a Bruker
instrument as a film on NaCl window. ESI-MS was recorded on a
ThermoQuest Finnigan LCQ-Duo instrument. Fingermark development at atmospheric pressure was performed with a standard
Superglue chamber manufactured for the Israel Police by “Automat
Ltd.” (Jerusalem, Israel). Vacuum superglue was performed in a
cylindrical aluminum chamber attached to a rotary oil pump, both
from Edwards High Vacuum Int. (Crawley, U.K.). Microscopic
observations were performed on an Olympus BX60 instrument
equipped with a reflected light fluorescence attachment.
2.2. Methods. 2.2.1. Synthesis. Ethyl Cyanoacrylate−Anthracene Adduct (3). Anthracene (3 g, 16.83 mmol) was dissolved in
toluene (30 mL) in a nitrogen atmosphere. Boric acid (5.4 mg, 0.51
mol %) and catechol (40.8 mg, 2.20 mol %) were added, followed by
ethyl cyanoacrylate (2.95g, 23.57 mmol). The mixture was refluxed for
18 h and monitored by TLC (20% Ethyl acetate/hexane). Toluene
was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the gum was passed
through silica gel column eluting with hexane followed by dichloromethane (0−100%) to obtain a 3.7 g white solid; that solid was
suspended in diethyl ether 10 mL and filtered through suction to get a
3.57 g pure ester adduct in 70% yield. Anal. (Found) Calcd: C, (79.19)
78.82; H (5.65) 5.53; N (4.62) 4.62.
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.4(m, 1H), 7.3(m, 2H), 7.31−
7.11 (m, 5H), 4.88(s, 1H), 4.43(t, 1H, J = 2−7), 4.16 (q, 2H), 2.8 (d,
1H, J = 2.7), 2.22(dd, 1H, J = 2.7) 1.3 (t, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): 167, 143.34, 142.68, 138.32, 137.43, 127.895, 127.84, 126.91,
126.65, 126.12, 125.38, 124.22, 123.92, 120.03, 63.53,52, 47, 43.37,
38.23. 14.39. Mass: 321(m + 18), 326 (m + 23), 179 (anthracene + 1);
FT-IR: 2980 (alkyl CH stretch); 2255 (CN); 1770 (ester CO stretch);
1465 (CC strecht); 1253 (ester stretch). MP: 124−125 °C. TLC:
anthracene Rf 0.9, ethyl cyanoacrylate adduct Rf 0.69, ethyl
cyanoacrylate polymer does not move on TLC.
Cyanoacrylic Acid−Anthracene Adduct (4). Ethyl cyanoacrylate
anthracene adduct (7.5 g, 24.72 mmol) was dissolved in THF (150
mL); dropwise 5% aqueous lithium hydroxide (31 mL) (1.55g, 37
mmol) was added and stirred overnight at 25 °C. TLC (20% ethyl
acetate/hexane + 0.1% AcOH) showed completion of hydrolysis.
Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was evaporated under reduced pressure, and
the reaction mixture was cooled to 10 °C, acidified by dil. HCl to pH
2. It was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL); Evaporation of
ethyl acetate under reduced pressure gave a white solid, which was
suspended in diethyl ether and filtered to obtain 6.21g pure acid
(91%). Anal. (Found) Calcd: C, (78.53) 78.12; H, (4.77) 4.63; N,
(5.09) 5.07.
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.48 (m, 1H), 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.22−
7.13 (m, 5H), 4.87 (S, 1H), 4.43 (d, 1H, J = 2.4), 2.7 (dd, 1H, J = 2.7,
10.5), 2.2 (dd, 1H, J = 3, 10.5). 13C NMR: 170.3, 153.98, 142.91,
142.47, 137.91, 127.94, 127.89, 126.9, 126.74, 126.10, 125.47, 124.05,
123.86, 119.38, 51.82, 47.8, 43.28, 38.17. Mass: 298 (m + Na), 179
(anthracene + 1). Mp: 205−207 °C. FT-IR: 3400−2600 (OH
stretch); 2243 (CN); 1718 (acid CO stretch); 1483 (CC stretch).
Rf (20% ethyl acetate/hexane + drop of acetic acid) = 0.3.
In a clean and dry 500 mL round-bottomed glass charge under N2
acid adduct (15 g, 54.47 mmol), DMAP (3 mg) and 300 mL of
dichloromethane, followed by benzyl alcohol (5.72 mL, 55 mmol).
The flask was immersed into an ice/water bath, and a solution of DCC
(11.35g, 55 mmol) was added dropwise and stir for 6 h. TLC (20%
ethyl acetate/hexane) shows completion of reaction (acid Rf = 0.3,
ester Rf = 0.71). The white precipitate of dicyclohexyl urea was isolated
by filtration and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced
pressure to yield a white solid. The isolated solid was washed with
diethyl ether to yield 18 g (90% yield) of the pure ester adduct.
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.45(m, 3H), 7.3(m, 3H), 7.12 (m,
2H), 6.9 (t, 1H, J = 7.5), 6.8 (d, 1H, J = 7.2), 5.19 (d, 1H, J = 12), 5.06
(d, 1H, J = 12.3), 4.8 (S, 1H), 4.4 (S, 1H), 2.8 (dd, 1H J = 2.1 and
11.11), 2.2 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1. 11.1). 13C NMR: 166.87, 143.18, 142.46,
138.11, 137.02, 134.87, 129.20, 129.12, 129.007, 127.8, 127.75, 126.87,
126.62, 126.07, 125.25, 124.03, 123.83, 119.97, 69.01, 51.95, 47.52,
43.33, 38.18. Anal (Found) Calcd: C, (82.17) 80.17; H, (5.24) 5.30;
N, (3.83) 4.02. IR cm−1: 3034, 2939, 2236, 1757, 1623, 1457, 1227,
1189, 1049, 966, 736, 698. Mp: 203−205 °C.
Cyanaoacrylate Benzyl Ester (7a). Retro-Diels−Alder reaction of
adduct with maleic anhydride was applied as follows:
In a clean dry round-bottomed glass fitted with a reflux condenser,
benzyl cyanoacrylate anthracene adduct (5 g, 13.67 mmol), maleic
4823
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma400837h | Macromolecules 2013, 46, 4822−4828
Macromolecules
Article
126.71, 126.14, 125.60, 124.12, 123.87, 119.53, 76.60, 76.53, 54.53,
51.86, 47.37, 43.27, 38.27. IR, cm−1: 3295, 3282, 2904, 2904, 2242,
2132, 1748, 1459, 1367, 1270, 1228, 1183, 1049, 754. Mp = 96−98
°C. Anal. (Found) Calcd: C, (80.43) 79.76; H, (4.82) 4.90; N, (4.47)
4.70.
Propargylcyanoacrylate Monomer (7d). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.10 (S, 1H), 6.68 (s, 1H), 4.86 (d, 2H), 2.55 (t, 1H); 13C
NMR: 160.03, 144.56, 116.20, 114.25, 76.52, 76.38, 54.23
Anthracenemethylcyanocrylate Anthracene Adduct (5e). 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.6 (S, 1H), 8.24 (d, 2H, J = 8.7),
8.10 (d, 2H, J = 8.1), 7.6 (t, 2H, J = 6.6, 8.7), 7.5 (t, 2H, J = 7.8),
7.30−7.11 (m, 5H), 7.0 (t, 1H, J = 8.4), 6.56 (t, 1H, J = 8.5), 6.4 (d,
1H, J = 12.6), 6.22 (d, 1H, J = 7.2), 5.94 (d, 1H, J = 12.3), 4.58 (S,
1H), 4.34 (t, 1H, J = 2.4), 2.86 (dd, 1H J = 2.6), 2.18 (dd, 1H, J = 2.6).
13
C NMR: 167.25, 143.24, 142.23, 137.99, 136.83, 131.63, 131.47,
130.10, 129.45, 127.72, 127.58, 127.33, 126.77, 126.29, 126.06, 125.62,
125.10, 124.14, 123.93, 123.72, 119.98, 61.56, 51.82, 47.60, 43.29,
38.18. IR, cm−1: 3057, 3025, 2947, 2232, 1745, 1621, 1452, 1251,
1205, 1173, 1038, 865, 725. Mp = 160−162 °C. Anal. (Found) Calcd:
C, (85.14) 85.00; H, (4.98) 4.98; N, (3.01) 3.07.
Anthracenemethyl Cyanoacrylate (7e). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.4- 7.39 (m, 1H), 7.38−7.32 (m, 4H), 7.24−7.18 (m, 4),
7.06 (S, 1H), 6.72 (S, 1H), 5.64 (dd, 2H).
Naphthylmethylcyanoacrylate Anthracene Adduct (5f). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.05 (d, 1H, J = 7.8), 7.9 (m, 2H), 7.65−7.58
(m, 4H), 7.47−7.37 (m, 2H), 7.74−7.06 (m, 3H), 7.06 (m, 1H), 6.78
(m, 1H), 6.38 (m, 1H), 5.65 (d, 1H, J = 12.3), 5.54 (d, 1H, J = 12.3),
4.68 (S, 1H), 4.38 (t, 1H, J = 2.4), 2.84 (dd, 1H, J = 2.7), 2.20 (dd, 1H,
J = 2.7). 13C NMR: 166.91, 143.15, 142.28, 138.03, 136.82, 134.02,
131.99, 130.41, 130.13, 129.09, 128.89, 127.37, 127.61, 127.27, 126.79,
126.49, 126.36, 126.04, 125.55, 125.05, 123.90, 123.81, 123.74, 119.96,
67.27, 51.88, 47.55, 43.28, 38.11. IR, cm−1: 3019, 2960, 2239, 1751,
1626, 1459, 1219, 1186, 1037, 952. Mp: 155−158 °C. Anal. (Found)
Calcd: C, (83.83) 83.71; H, (5.03) 5.05; N, (3.37) 3.44
Naphthylmethylcyanoacrylate Monomer (7f). 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.05 (m, 1H), 7.97−7.91 (m, 2H), 7.58−7.41 (m,
4H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 5.77 (S, 2H).
Fluorenmethylcyanoacrylate Anthracene Adduct (5g). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.8 (d, 1H, J = 7.5), 7.66 (d, 1H, J = 7.7), 7.5−
7.22 (m, 12H), 7.22−7.17 (m, 1H), 7.06−7.04 (m, 1H), 4.83 (s, 1H),
4.47 (m, 2H), 4.25 (m, 2H), 2.8 (dd, 1H), 2.23 {dd, 1H). 13C NMR:
167.09, 143.41, 143.34, 143.07, 142.49, 141.59, 141.55, 138.09, 137.21,
128.35, 127.87, 127.65, 127.59, 126.91, 126.74, 126.13, 125.45, 125.33,
125.20, 124.11, 123.87, 120.44, 120.42, 119.87, 69.35, 52.12, 47.72,
46.86, 43.36, 38.32; IR, cm−1: 3038, 2966, 2927, 2233, 1752, 1628,
1446, 1374, 1270, 1244, 1231, 1185, 1107, 1043, 965, 764, 582. Mp:
91−93 °C.
Flurenmethylcyanoacrylate Monomer (7g). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.80 (d, 2H, J = 7.2), 7.68 (d, 2H, J = 7.2), 7.43−7.41 (m,
2H), 7.37−7.32 (m, 2H), 7.03 (d, 1H, J = 1.2), 6.68 (d, 1H, J = 1.7),
4.53 (m, 3H).
2.2.2. Development of Latent Fingerprints. Sebaceous and eccrine
fingerprints were deposited by a single donor. Fresh fingerprints and 1
day old fingerprints were used. Sebaceous fingerprints were deposited
by first rubbing the hands on oily parts of the forehead. Eccrine
fingerprints were deposited after washing the hands thoroughly and
letting the hands dry. After about 15 min, fingerprints were deposited.
Those fingerprints deposited on microscope glass slides were
developed in a small Superglue chamber, provided with a hot plate
tuned to 200 °C. The slides were exposed to fumes in the chamber for
20 min, while heating synthesized cyanoacrylates. The fingerprint
development power of these substances was also tested under vacuum.
A Pyrex desiccator was used as a development chamber. The entire
chamber was heated over a heating plate for two to 3 h while
maintaining a vacuum (∼10−4 mmHg).
2.2.3. Development of Fingerprints in Organic Solution.
Cyanoacrylate monomers were added to inert organic solvents,
chlorinated hydrocarbons, hydrocarbons, ethers, and aromatic solvents
to determine solubility, stability, and ability to develop fingerprints
applied on glass slides. Fingerprint development was determined by
anhydride (4 g, 40.8 mmol), hydroquinone (15 mg), P2O5 (1 g), and
dry xylene (150 mL) were loaded under nitrogen, and the reaction
mixture was refluxed with vigorous stirring for 56 h. The reaction
mixture was allowed to reach room temperature and filtered rapidly to
remove unreacted maleic anhydride and maleic anhydride-anthracene
adduct under inert atmosphere. The solution was evaporated to
dryness, and the reddish brown solid residue was suspend in 100 mL
dry diethyl ether, filter, and evaporated to about 10 mL and left under
refrigeration overnight to allow isolation of a red oil as
benzylcyanoacrylate monomers. Impurities confirmed by NMR are
maleic anhydride, maleic anhydride-anthracene adduct and unreacted
benzylcyanoacrylate anthracene adduct, accounting for 15% to 20%,
crude weight to 2.7 g. The residue was further purified in dry ether.
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.31−7.33 (m, 5H), 7.08 (d, 1H, J
= 0.6), 6.63 (d, 1H, J = 0.6H2), 5.34 (S, 2H); 13C NMR: 160.4,
143.89, 140.94, 129.07, 129.015, 128.94, 116.6, 114.3, 68.75. IR, cm−1:
3124, 2992, 2232, 1732, 1602.
Synthesis of Poly(benzyl cyanoacrylate) (8a). Benzyl cyanoacrylate monomer (2g, 10.68 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF, and
dimethyl aminopyridine (0.15 mg) was added and left for 4 h with
stirring. The pinkish red suspension was filtered and washed with
diethyl ether to yield 1.88g of polymer.
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.35 (bs-5H), 5.2 (bs, 2H), 2.3 (bs,
2H). IR, cm−1: 2992, 2240, 1745, 1439, 1372, 1247, 1008, 856, 744,
691. GPC: Mw = 10982 Da. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC):
362 °C.
Other cyanoacrylate ester monomers were synthesized using the
above procedures; the data analysis is as follows:
4-Nitrobenzyl Cyanoacrylate Anthracene Adduct (5b). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.2 (d, 2H, J = 8.2), 7.46 (d, 2H, J = 8.1), 7.43
(S, 1H), 7.3 (m, 2H), 7.21 (m, 3H), 6.9 (m, 2H), 5.19 (s, 2H) 4.8 (S,
1H), 4.4 (s, 1H), 2.8 (dd, 1H) 2.2 (dd, 1H). 13C NMR: 166.85,
148.20, 143.08, 142.57, 141.87, 137.91, 137.05, 129.24, 127.96, 126.97,
126.65, 126.08, 125.13, 124.24, 124.175, 123.94, 119.75, 67.28, 52.0,
47.66, 43.22, 38.30. IR, cm−1: 3077, 2950, 2243, 1754, 1630, 1605,
1516, 1453, 1340, 1270, 1245, 1226, 1194, 1106, 1055, 827, 769,
630,587; Mp: 149−151 °C. Anal. (Found) Calcd: C, (73.16) 72.86; H,
(4.42) 4.63; N, (6.83) 6.98.
4-Nitrobenzyl Cyanoacrylate (7b). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 8.27 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.59 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.13(d, 1H, J = 0.6
Hz), 6.71 (d, 1H, J = 0.6 Hz), 5.4 (S, 2H). 13C NMR: 160.32, 144.67,
141.67, 141.65, 128.83, 124.26, 116.22, 114.33, 66.92. IR cm−1: 3120,
2987, 2236, 1735, 1657, 1606, 1514, 1345, 1280, 1196, 994. mp: 85−
87 °C. Mass: 232 (m+); Anal. (Found) Calcd: C, 56.86 (56.90); H,
3.58 (3.47); N, 11.91 (12.06).
Cyanoethylcyanoacrylate Anthracene Adduct (5c). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.538 (m, 1H), 7.35 (m, 2H), 7.33- 7.12 (m,
5H), 4.94 (s, 1H), 4.47 (t, 1H, J = 2.7), 4.29−4.13 (m, 2H), 2.84 (dd,
1H, J = 2.7) 2.64- 2.60 (m, 2H), 2.25 (dd, 1H, J = 2.7). 13C NMR:
166.767, 143.01, 142.40, 137.71, 137.02, 128.04, 127.93, 126.99,
126.81, 126.19, 125.22, 124.29, 123.81, 119.39, 116.68, 61.29, 52.00,
47.52, 43.25, 38.22, 18.06.
Cyanoethylcyanoacrylate Monomer (7c). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.09 (d, 1H, J = 0.6H2), 6.70 (d, 1H, J = 0.6H2), 4.47 (t,
2H, J = 6.3 Hz), 2.81 (t, 2H, J = 6.3 Hz). 13C NMR: 160.19, 144.96,
116.53, 115.90, 114.19, 60.95, 18.06.
Propargylcyanoacrylate Anthracene Adduct (5d). 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.51−7.48 (m, 1H), 7.35−7.30 (m, 3H), 7.25−7.11
(m, 4H), 4.92 (S, 1H), 4.77−471 (dd, 1H, J = 2.7, 2.4), 4.64−4.58
(dd, 1H, J = 2.4), 4.43 (t, 1H, J = 2.7 and 2.4), 2.83−2.78 (dd, 1H, J =
2.7), 2.53 (t, 1H, J = 2.4) 2.26−2.20 (dd, 1H, J = 2.7). 13C NMR:
166.41, 143.116, 142.44, 137.95, 136.95, 127.97, 127.89, 126.95,
4824
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma400837h | Macromolecules 2013, 46, 4822−4828
Macromolecules
Article
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Cyanoacrylate Esters by Depolymerization of Transesterified Polymersa
a
R represents a fluorescent residue.
dipping glass slides containing latent fingerprints into the monomer
solution for a few seconds; then the slides were dried in the hood at
room temperature and visualized under appropriate light. Of the
various solvents tried, xylene, dichloromethane (DCM), and ethyl
acetate (EtOAc) fulfilled the primary requisites of dissolving the
substances without polymerizing them and with minimal damage to
the fingerprint. Xylene was selected at a concentration of 1% w/v.
Xylene solution of known BY-40 fluorescent dye was used for
comparison.
Fingermark results were photographed under incident white light.
The results of the new materials were also photographed by
penetrating UV illumination (350 nm) using a lens equipped with a
standard UV filter. Fingermarks developed by BY-40 fluorescent dye +
ECA were photographed under penetrating blue light (450 nm) with a
lens equipped with an orange filter.
esterified with the desired alcohol to render the adduct ester
(5). Monomeric cyanoacrylate esters were displaced from
adduct 5 by retro-Diels−Alder with maleic anhydride.
Ethyl cyanoacrylate−anthracene adduct (3) was formed in
high yield from the reaction of 1.5 molar excess cyanoacrylate
to anthracene (2) in toluene. The hydrolysis of the ethyl ester
proceeded smoothly at room temperature. Very pure
anthracene-cyanoacrylic acid (4) was easily isolated at 90%
yield. From all conventional esterification methods tested, the
dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC) coupling reagent in the
presence of dimethyl aminopyridine (DMAP) in dichloromethane was most effective. Pure esters (5) were obtained in
about 90% yield after crystallization. This reaction was scaled
up to a 50 g scale. The last step in this synthesis was the retroDiels−Alder reaction. The desired cyanoacrylate ester-anthracene adduct was refluxed in xylene in the presence of maleic
anhydride. Maleic anhydride−anthracene adduct (6) crystallized from the reaction mixture on cooling with 98% recovery.
Cyanoacrylate esters (7) were isolated by removal of the
solvent under reduced pressure and/or crystallizations.
From the substances synthesized, only the dansyl ethanolamide (5h) derivative could not be isolated as a monomer,
probably due to the protonation of the dimethyl amine moiety.
A base is required to release the free base form, which rapidly
polymerizes, impeding its isolation. 1H NMR data of substances
obtained in every step are provided in the Experimental
Section.
3.2. Fingerprint Development. 3.2.1. Fume Development. First development experiments were carried out with the
new cyanoacrylate ester adducts with anthracene mixed with an
excess of maleic anhydride.. The mixture was heated to 200 °C
in a regular cyanoacrylate fuming chamber. Exhibits were
observed under UV light after ventilating the chamber. Results
show that the surfaces tested were coated with a substance
having blue fluorescence, which could be easily removed.
Fingermarks, however, were not developed. The liquid
remaining in the heating recipient solidified quickly on cooling.
Analysis of the remaining mixture showed the presence of the
benzyl cyanoacrylate-anthracene adduct and maleic anhydride,
together with other unknown substances. Expected maleic
anhydride-anthracene adduct was not detected in the mixture.
It is believed that some adduct underwent retro-Diels−Alder.
The released anthracene rapidly sublimated before it could
react with maleic anhydride, thus coating the exhibits without
developing fingermarks.
Further experiments were conducted with the synthesized
cyanoacrylates as pure materials and as mixtures with Superglue
at atmospheric pressure. The experiments were performed in a
fuming chamber heating up to 150 °C. Fumes did not evolve
when pure materials were used. Fingermark development was
not observed on the exhibits. Fingermark development was
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Synthesis of Monomers and Polymers. Two
methods were applied for the synthesis of cyanoacrylate ester
monomers. The first attempt (Scheme 1) to produce the
monomers involved the trans-esterification of poly(ethyl
cyanoacrylate).
A test was conducted to replace ethyl esters with fluorescent
alcohols. The transesterification pathway toward polymer was
thoroughly explored with benzyl alcohol. This pathway gave
poor results due to low transesterification yield, as observed by
1
H NMR (